2004
DOI: 10.1002/jbm.a.30156
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency and resolution dependence of the anisotropic impedance estimation in cortical bone using time‐resolved scanning acoustic microscopy

Abstract: The influences of frequency and spatial resolution on the anisotropic impedance estimation of cortical bone was investigated in the frequency range 25-100 MHz. A set of spherically focused transducers provided a spatial resolution in the range from 150 down to about 20 mum. Four embedded cortical bone samples (two male, two female, two donors aged <30 years, two donors aged >70 years) were cut with different orientations relative to the long axis of the femur (0-90 degrees ). From each section, impedance maps … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
48
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2014
2014

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(48 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
0
48
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The principles of the acoustic data acquisition and the conversion of the measured reflection amplitude to acoustic impedance and elastic coefficients have been described elsewhere (Lakshmanan et al, 2007;Raum et al, 2003Raum et al, , 2004Raum, 2008) and are summarized in the appendix.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Of Parameter Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The principles of the acoustic data acquisition and the conversion of the measured reflection amplitude to acoustic impedance and elastic coefficients have been described elsewhere (Lakshmanan et al, 2007;Raum et al, 2003Raum et al, , 2004Raum, 2008) and are summarized in the appendix.…”
Section: Theoretical Background Of Parameter Extractionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This remain true when cortical thickness is less than that required for testing samples machining, but the techniques do not take into account porosity. Moreover, they are extremely sensitive to the region where the test is carried out (Zysset et al, 1999), due to their high resolution from a few mm for SAM (Raum et al, 2004) down to 1 mm for latest indenter (Turner et al, 1999). It may be possible to infer the apparent Young's modulus from such measurements performed at the microscopic level.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Therefore measurements of microscopic elastic properties of bone have been made with in vitro measurement methods, such as nanoindentation and scanning acoustic microscopy (SAM). [8][9][10][11][12][13] These methods can provide information on the elastic modulus, hardness, and acoustic impedance in small areas of bone. These methods especially provide information originating from the direction perpendicular to the specimen surface.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%