2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.compstruc.2007.01.023
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency- and time-domain methods for the numerical modeling of full-bridge aeroelasticity

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
22
0
2

Year Published

2012
2012
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 14 publications
0
22
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…In this paper, the quasi-steady theory for the self-excited forces is used to overcome this difficulty by assuming that the aerodynamic derivatives approach quasi-steady theory when the reduced frequency K goes to zero. This approach has also been used by Salvatori and Borri [3]and Øiseth et al [11]. As K goes to zero, the transfer function presented in Eq.…”
Section: Curve Fitting Rational Functions To the Aerodynamic Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 97%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In this paper, the quasi-steady theory for the self-excited forces is used to overcome this difficulty by assuming that the aerodynamic derivatives approach quasi-steady theory when the reduced frequency K goes to zero. This approach has also been used by Salvatori and Borri [3]and Øiseth et al [11]. As K goes to zero, the transfer function presented in Eq.…”
Section: Curve Fitting Rational Functions To the Aerodynamic Derivativesmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…The self-excited forces cause flutter, while both the self-excited and the buffeting forces are important for the dynamic response of bridges in strong winds. The multi-mode frequencydomain method has been widely used to study flutter stability and dynamic response to strong winds [1][2][3]. The method will provide results of high accuracy if there are no strong nonlinear characteristics in the system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Despite the considerable progress made in the modeling of self-excited forces using rational or indicial functions (e.g. Cao and Sarkar, 2012;Caracoglia and Jones, 2003;Chowdhury and Sarkar, 2005;Costa, 2007;Costa and Borri, 2006;Salvatori and Borri, 2007;Zhang et al, 2011;Zhang and Chen, 2010;Øiseth et al, 2011, aerodynamic derivatives, as introduced in bridge engineering by Scanlan and Tomko (1971), remains the most common output from wind tunnel tests of bridges. The aerodynamic derivatives for a bridge cross-section can be determined by either forced or free vibration tests.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Flutter is generally studied within linearized aeroelastic models, which can provide the range of wind speeds where Hopf bifurcation occurs. To consider the effects due to the unsteadiness of the relative motion between the section and the air flow, indicial Theodorsen type [14][15][16] formulations can be adopted to predict more accurately the critical wind speed at the onset of the flutter instability [17] with respect to the quasi-steady formulation. The equations of motion for suspension bridges were employed for aeroelastic investigations in [18], where analysis were centered on experimentally determined flutter derivatives, and a full threedimensional modal analysis of the structure.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%