2018
DOI: 10.1093/gji/ggy422
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-dependent quality factors from the deconvolution of ambient noise recordings in a borehole in West Bohemia/Vogtland

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 41 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…These results were later confirmed by considering a large number of test sites (Parolai et al 2022). Recently, Haendel et al (2019) estimated the Q in shallow geological layers by analyzing seismic noise recorded by a vertical array of seismometers mainly through the adaption of the method of Fukushima et al (2016) to determine Q S −1 .…”
Section: Q S Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…These results were later confirmed by considering a large number of test sites (Parolai et al 2022). Recently, Haendel et al (2019) estimated the Q in shallow geological layers by analyzing seismic noise recorded by a vertical array of seismometers mainly through the adaption of the method of Fukushima et al (2016) to determine Q S −1 .…”
Section: Q S Estimatesmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…In this section, we consider a configuration with a receiver at the Earth's surface and one or more receivers at depth. This is akin the configuration chosen in Fukushima et al (2016) and Haendel et al (2019).…”
Section: Up-down Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Within the context of seismic interferometry, deconvolutions need to be stacked (integrated) before subsurface parameters can be estimated. In the current implementations of the up-down method, however (Fukushima et al 2016;Haendel et al 2019) Q is estimated from each deconvolution and afterwards Q is averaged over all estimates. Below we numerically test both approaches.…”
Section: Integrationmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation