2011
DOI: 10.2534/jjasnaoe.14.123
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Domain Analysis on Primary Conversion Efficiency of a Floating OWC-type Wave Energy Converter

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 9 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Frequency-domain analysis is a widely used method for wave-structure interactions and, in the method, the dynamic system is assumed to be fully linear: the governing equation is the linear Laplace equation (based on the incompressible potential flows); the body and seabed boundary conditions are linear; and the free-surface condition can be linearized for practical applications. Although the assumptions are strict, the frequencydomain analysis could provide reliable and accurate assessments for the hydrodynamic parameters and responses, such as the added mass, the radiation-damping coefficients, the wave-excitation forces, and the response amplitude operators (RAOs) [1][2][3][4][5], and, in some cases, it can be even extended to hydro-elastic analysis [6] and the elastic wave-energy converters (WECs) [7,8]. For its applications in wave-energy converters, the conventional frequency-domain analysis may provide an accurate calculation for the resonance frequency/period of the device, which is generally regarded as the most important parameter for wave-energy converters, since most wave-energy converters would be ideally optimized to have resonance with the wave for efficient energy extraction from the waves [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Frequency-domain analysis is a widely used method for wave-structure interactions and, in the method, the dynamic system is assumed to be fully linear: the governing equation is the linear Laplace equation (based on the incompressible potential flows); the body and seabed boundary conditions are linear; and the free-surface condition can be linearized for practical applications. Although the assumptions are strict, the frequencydomain analysis could provide reliable and accurate assessments for the hydrodynamic parameters and responses, such as the added mass, the radiation-damping coefficients, the wave-excitation forces, and the response amplitude operators (RAOs) [1][2][3][4][5], and, in some cases, it can be even extended to hydro-elastic analysis [6] and the elastic wave-energy converters (WECs) [7,8]. For its applications in wave-energy converters, the conventional frequency-domain analysis may provide an accurate calculation for the resonance frequency/period of the device, which is generally regarded as the most important parameter for wave-energy converters, since most wave-energy converters would be ideally optimized to have resonance with the wave for efficient energy extraction from the waves [9,10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The numerical results are compared with those of a single-chamber OWC (Fig.1). This paper presents the results of 2D numerical analysis in frequency domain for the OWCs by Nagata et al's 5) method. The major physical quantities examined are the primary conversion efficiency, EFF; the reflection coefficient, K R ; and the air pressure in the air-chambers, p/w 0 H; where the pressure p is nondimensionalized using the specific weight of water, w 0 , and the incident wave height, H. The numerical model is validated by comparing with the experimental data of one-chamber OWC by Ojima et al 6),7)…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In all these studies, incompressible air is assumed. More recently, FIG Nagata et al 10 divided the whole flow region into two coupled regions: one region represents the external flow field, and the other the flow field in the OWC water column. These two regions are coupled via their sharing surface to form a full dynamic system.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%