2018
DOI: 10.1515/psicl-2019-0006
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency effects and markedness in phonotactics

Abstract: In this paper, we take up the challenge of exploring the relationship between markedness and frequency in phonotactics. The study is based on word-initial and word-final consonant clusters in Polish and English. The aim of this study is threefold. First, we establish logarithmic frequencies for word-initial and final consonant clusters compiled from two resources, a dictionary (or paradigm) and a written corpus. Second, we examine the preferability status of clusters in three frequency bands (high, mid, low) i… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
2

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 2 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…/t ͡ ʂʨ-/ in czcić 'to worship', /kt-/ kto 'who' or /rv-/ in rwać 'to tear' (these tautomorphemic examples demonstrate that sonority plateaus and reversals are attested, and although they are statistically rarer, they are not exceptional and can be very frequent in language use). Cluster markedness does not correlate with token frequency (Orzechowska & Zydorowicz 2019). There are numerous clusters which are considered universally dispreferred and are still very common in language use in Polish, e.g., /kt-/ in który 'which' or kto 'who' and /ɡd-/ in gdy 'when'.…”
Section: Polish Phonotacticsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…/t ͡ ʂʨ-/ in czcić 'to worship', /kt-/ kto 'who' or /rv-/ in rwać 'to tear' (these tautomorphemic examples demonstrate that sonority plateaus and reversals are attested, and although they are statistically rarer, they are not exceptional and can be very frequent in language use). Cluster markedness does not correlate with token frequency (Orzechowska & Zydorowicz 2019). There are numerous clusters which are considered universally dispreferred and are still very common in language use in Polish, e.g., /kt-/ in który 'which' or kto 'who' and /ɡd-/ in gdy 'when'.…”
Section: Polish Phonotacticsmentioning
confidence: 99%