2013 IEEE Aerospace Conference 2013
DOI: 10.1109/aero.2013.6497130
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-hop multiple-access systems with limited per-hop multi-user detection

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Each user employs different pilots. In SFH systems, the interference contains channel noise and MAI caused by collision, which is controllable if either orthogonal hopping patterns or max-n orthogonal set mentioned in [9] are employed. But the hopping patterns are not independent in these systems, so coordination is also required.…”
Section: A Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Each user employs different pilots. In SFH systems, the interference contains channel noise and MAI caused by collision, which is controllable if either orthogonal hopping patterns or max-n orthogonal set mentioned in [9] are employed. But the hopping patterns are not independent in these systems, so coordination is also required.…”
Section: A Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, these MUDs can not be used for coherent modulations, as their lacking of phase estimation. Capacity analysis of Per-Hop MUD (PH-MUD), with standard PSK modulation, was presented in [9] by Frederick J. Block, and then a feasible 2-user PH-MUD algorithm was proposed in [10].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Several MUD approaches have been considered for FH systems (e.g., [4], [5], [6], [7]). Limited per-hop MUD for FH [8] is of particular interest here. This is designed to handle a small number of colliding users on a each hop and was shown to provide a significant improvement in performance even when the receiver is capable of processing only two colliding users jointly.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In recent years, there has been effective work on improving the performance of frequency hopping systems [12][13][14], it was assumed that the receiver has full knowledge of hopping patterns of all users. This assumption requires additional coordination among users and is usually appropriated for a base station (BS)-mobile station (MS) scenario.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%