Objectives
Administrative claims data sets are often used for emergency care
research and policy investigations of healthcare resource utilization, acute
care practices, and evaluation of quality improvement interventions. Despite
the high profile of emergency department (ED) visits in analyses using
administrative claims, little work has evaluated the degree to which
existing definitions based on claims data accurately captures conventionally
defined hospital-based ED services. We sought to construct an operational
definition for ED visitation using a comprehensive Medicare data set and to
compare this definition to existing operational definitions used by
researchers and policymakers.
Methods
We examined four operational definitions of an ED visit commonly used
by researchers and policymakers using a 20% sample of the 2012
Medicare Chronic Condition Warehouse (CCW) data set. The CCW data set
included all Part A (hospital) and Part B (hospital outpatient, physician)
claims for a nationally representative sample of continuously enrolled
Medicare fee-for-services beneficiaries. Three definitions were based on
published research or existing quality metrics including: 1) provider
claims–based definition, 2) facility claims–based
definition, and 3) CMS Research Data Assistance Center (ResDAC) definition.
In addition, we developed a fourth operational definition (Yale definition)
that sought to incorporate additional coding rules for identifying ED
visits. We report levels of agreement and disagreement among the four
definitions.
Results
Of 10,717,786 beneficiaries included in the sample data set,
22% had evidence of ED use during the study year under any of the ED
visit definitions. The definition using provider claims identified a total
of 4,199,148 ED visits, the facility definition 4,795,057 visits, the ResDAC
definition 5,278,980 ED visits, and the Yale definition 5,192,235 ED visits.
The Yale definition identified a statistically different (p < 0.05)
collection of ED visits than all other definitions including 17%
more ED visits than the provider definition and 2% fewer visits than
the ResDAC definition. Differences in ED visitation counts between each
definition occurred for several reasons including the inclusion of critical
care or observation services in the ED, discrepancies between facility and
provider billing regulations, and operational decisions of each
definition.
Conclusion
Current operational definitions of ED visitation using administrative
claims produce different estimates of ED visitation based on the underlying
assumptions applied to billing data and data set availability. Future
analyses using administrative claims data should seek to validate specific
definitions and inform the development of a consistent, consensus ED
visitation definitions to standardize research reporting and the
interpretation of policy interventions.