Identification of Emergency Department Visits in Medicare Administrative Claims: Approaches and Implications

Abstract

Objectives Administrative claims data sets are often used for emergency care research and policy investigations of healthcare resource utilization, acute care practices, and evaluation of quality improvement interventions. Despite the high profile of emergency department (ED) visits in analyses using administrative claims, little work has evaluated the degree to which existing definitions based on claims data accurately captures conventionally defined hospital-based ED services. We sought to construct an operational definition for ED visitation using a comprehensive Medicare data set and to compare this definition to existing operational definitions used by researchers and policymakers. Methods We examined four operational definitions of an ED visit commonly used by researchers and policymakers using a 20% sample of the 2012 Medicare Chronic Condition Warehouse (CCW) data set. The CCW data set included all Part A (hospital) and Part B (hospital outpatient, physician) claims for a nationally representative sample of continuously enrolled Medicare fee-for-services beneficiaries. Three definitions were based on published research or existing quality metrics including: 1) provider claims–based definition, 2) facility claims–based definition, and 3) CMS Research Data Assistance Center (ResDAC) definition. In addition, we developed a fourth operational definition (Yale definition) that sought to incorporate additional coding rules for identifying ED visits. We report levels of agreement and disagreement among the four definitions. Results Of 10,717,786 beneficiaries included in the sample data set, 22% had evidence of ED use during the study year under any of the ED visit definitions. The definition using provider claims identified a total of 4,199,148 ED visits, the facility definition 4,795,057 visits, the ResDAC definition 5,278,980 ED visits, and the Yale definition 5,192,235 ED visits. The Yale definition identified a statistically different (p < 0.05) collection of ED visits than all other definitions including 17% more ED visits than the provider definition and 2% fewer visits than the ResDAC definition. Differences in ED visitation counts between each definition occurred for several reasons including the inclusion of critical care or observation services in the ED, discrepancies between facility and provider billing regulations, and operational decisions of each definition. Conclusion Current operational definitions of ED visitation using administrative claims produce different estimates of ED visitation based on the underlying assumptions applied to billing data and data set availability. Future analyses using administrative claims data should seek to validate specific definitions and inform the development of a consistent, consensus ED visitation definitions to standardize research reporting and the interpretation of policy interventions.

Rivaroxaban versus warfarin treatment among morbidly obese patients with venous thromboembolism: Comparative effectiveness, safety, and costs

“…ER coding may be limited by differences in dataset availability and lack of specificity. An analysis of Medicare data identified differences in ER events based on provider versus facility claims, including overcounting ER events for patients who may have emergency services outside the ER [25]. Additionally, as more patients with VTE are evaluated for outpatient therapy, coding may be less specific in the ER.…”

Outcomes after observation stays among older adult Medicare beneficiaries in the USA: retrospective cohort study

“…For our comparator populations, we identified index emergency department treatment-and-discharge stays using revenue center codes 0450 to 0459 and 0981, as has been done previously. 33 Inpatient stays were pre-identified in inpatient Standard Analytic Files. We included care episodes of patients aged 65 years and over on the date of admission with at least 30 days of pre-admission enrollment in Medicare fee for service and 30 days of post-discharge enrollment in Medicare fee for service in the absence of death.…”

“…33 Inpatient stays were pre-identified in inpatient Standard Analytic Files. We included care episodes of patients aged 65 years and over on the date of admission with at least 30 days of pre-admission enrollment in Medicare fee for service and 30 days of post-discharge enrollment in Medicare fee for service in the absence of death.…”

The Generalized Data Model for clinical research

“…It is a research project in and of itself to define visits, and their definitions are specific to the health services research question being investigated [14]. For example, a study of “emergency department” visits would need to consider at least four options to define a visit [24]. Data models that pre-define visits do not allow such flexibility.…”