2008
DOI: 10.1002/bdra.20479
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of holoprosencephaly in the International Clearinghouse Birth Defects Surveillance Systems: Searching for population variations

Abstract: The data do not suggest large differences in total prevalence of HPE among the studied populations that would be useful to generate etiological hypotheses.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

2
65
0
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
8
2

Relationship

2
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 85 publications
(70 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
(32 reference statements)
2
65
0
3
Order By: Relevance
“…They corresponded to holoprosencephaly (HPE) (25 fetuses) and corpus callosum agenesis (CCA) (17 fetuses). For HPE, the prevalence of TOP was of 1.6/1000 LB, in agreement with previous reports 79…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…They corresponded to holoprosencephaly (HPE) (25 fetuses) and corpus callosum agenesis (CCA) (17 fetuses). For HPE, the prevalence of TOP was of 1.6/1000 LB, in agreement with previous reports 79…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Holoprosencephaly (HPE, OMIM 236100) is the most common developmental forebrain anomaly in humans, with an incidence in liveborns of approximately 1 in 8,000 (Leoncini et al 2008;Muenke and Beachy 2001) and in conceptuses as high as 1 in 250 (Matsunaga and Shiota 1977). HPE results from incomplete cleavage of the prosencephalon into hemispheres.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Best estimates of prevalence of major birth defects, based on international data, are important to serve as a reference point for the evaluation of individual, regional, or national surveillance programs and to identify geographical regions of higher or lower than expected prevalence (Leoncini et al, 2008;Cocchi et al, 2010). Investigation of geographical differences may also provide an insight into the underlying etiology of EA.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%