2007
DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2007.00827.x
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency of Von Hippel‐Lindau germline mutations in classic and non‐classic Von Hippel‐Lindau disease identified by DNA sequencing, Southern blot analysis and multiplex ligation‐dependent probe amplification

Abstract: The current clinical diagnosis of Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) disease demands at least one specific [corrected] VHL manifestation in a patient with familial VHL disease, or, in a [corrected] sporadic patient, at least two or more hemangioblastomas or a single hemangioblastoma in combination with a typical visceral lesion. To evaluate this definition, we studied the frequency of germline VHL mutation in three patients groups: (i) multi-organ involvement (classic VHL), (ii) limited VHL manifestations meeting criteri… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
67
1

Year Published

2008
2008
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 63 publications
(71 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
3
67
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Thus, it is recommended that ''mutationnegative'' patients also be routinely screened with quantitative PCR analysis, for example, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Hes et al [2007] were the first to apply this method for VHL mutation screening, combining it with Southern blot and sequencing to achieve 95% mutation detection. Interestingly, Cho et al [2009] detected 100% of 15 VHL patients screened with sequencing and MLPA for detecting large deletions; the latter was described as more sensitive and easier than FISH and quantitative Southern analysis.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Thus, it is recommended that ''mutationnegative'' patients also be routinely screened with quantitative PCR analysis, for example, multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification (MLPA). Hes et al [2007] were the first to apply this method for VHL mutation screening, combining it with Southern blot and sequencing to achieve 95% mutation detection. Interestingly, Cho et al [2009] detected 100% of 15 VHL patients screened with sequencing and MLPA for detecting large deletions; the latter was described as more sensitive and easier than FISH and quantitative Southern analysis.…”
Section: Diagnosismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…7 vHL is normally diagnosed on a genetic basis, frequently presymptomatic in familial cases. However, diagnosis of isolated vHL cases is often delayed compared with familial cases, 8 and may never be recognized, as a clinical diagnosis requires at least two manifestations, often involving multiple medical specialists. 4 A timely diagnosis is essential to establish surveillance and offer genetic counselling to at-risk family members.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In many hereditary diseases, the implementation of MLPA in molecular diagnostics has led to the detection of new disease causing mutations. 4,5 In the Database of Genomic Variants 6 a copy number variant (CNV), which includes the MEFV gene has been reported. Thus far, it is unknown if large rearrangements within in the MEFV gene are associated with FMF.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%