2007 4th International Conference on Electrical and Electronics Engineering 2007
DOI: 10.1109/iceee.2007.4344988
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Offset Estimation and Compensation Using Superimposed Training

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The simulation results for all Doppler frequencies stated are presented in Figure 2. There it is possible to contrast the plots of NCMSE when the method proposed in this paper is used, against the compensation of CFO using [9], and then the estimation of the channel using bidimensional basis projection is carried out. It is possible to observe that the method proposed here performs exactly as the estimator does when no CFO is considered, but the number of DPS sequences is augmented.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The simulation results for all Doppler frequencies stated are presented in Figure 2. There it is possible to contrast the plots of NCMSE when the method proposed in this paper is used, against the compensation of CFO using [9], and then the estimation of the channel using bidimensional basis projection is carried out. It is possible to observe that the method proposed here performs exactly as the estimator does when no CFO is considered, but the number of DPS sequences is augmented.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This performance is less favorable compared to that exhibited by the estimator when no CFO is stated and the exact number of DPS sequences is utilized. This phenomenon is due to the fact that the frequency band-pass of the DPS is enlarged to absorb the possible errors during the rough estimation of the CFO, and consequently this increases the number of DPS sequences to be used, but this penalty is acceptable considering the gain obtained when this method is compared with the one that first corrects CFO using [9] and then estimates the communication channel using bidimensional basis projection. According to the figure presented, the gain between both methods is at least 5 dB for f d = 120 Hz, and 10 dB when f d = 10 Hz.…”
Section: Simulation Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Due to the lack of perfect oscillators and because of Doppler shifts, receivers in practical pass-band systems always experiment a carry frequency offset [8]. Among the mathematical operations found in a DDST-based digital communications receiver, CFO estimation has the more complex of all, both in time and resource usage.…”
Section: Carry Frequency Offset (Cfo) Estimation and Correctionmentioning
confidence: 99%