2009
DOI: 10.1016/j.ijcard.2007.12.067
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency, predictors and outcome of stent fracture after sirolimus-eluting stent implantation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
93
2
4

Year Published

2009
2009
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 102 publications
(106 citation statements)
references
References 16 publications
6
93
2
4
Order By: Relevance
“…14,23) Several studies have demonstrated that sirolimus-eluting stents are more likely to cause SF because of the closed-cell design and the stainless steel material with low flexibility and conformability. 24) Furthermore, it has been reported that overlap stenting and longer stent length are associated with SF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…14,23) Several studies have demonstrated that sirolimus-eluting stents are more likely to cause SF because of the closed-cell design and the stainless steel material with low flexibility and conformability. 24) Furthermore, it has been reported that overlap stenting and longer stent length are associated with SF.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…SF was defined as complete or partial separation of stent segments observed using plain fluoroscopy without contrast injection or IVUS. 14,15) SF was classified as grade I to V: I = involving a single-strut fracture; II = 2 or more strut fractures without deformation; III = 2 or more strut fractures with deformation; IV = multiple strut fractures with acquired transection but without a gap; and V = multiple strut fractures with acquired transection with a gap in the stent body. 16) Angiographic diagnosis of SF required an independent view and the agreement of 2 independent cardiologists.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“….7% of cases. [1][2][3][4][5][6][7][8] However, because of limited sensitivity of angiography to detect fracture, its true incidence is still unknown. In a recent report analyzed from autopsy findings, stent fracture was observed in 29% of total patients.…”
Section: Incidence and Definitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It was also frequently reported that stent failure might happen at any time, which can cause thrombosis, restenosis, pain and other clinical complications in patients (Kim et al, 2009;Umeda et al, 2009;Celik et al, 2009). If diagnosed with stent failure, patients will need to undergo further surgery to remove the failed stent and implant a new one to solve the problem.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%