2018
DOI: 10.1016/j.ifacol.2018.09.099
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency Response Function Identification of LPV Systems: a Global Approach with Application to Mechanical Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
4
1
1

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…5) Identification Approach: To identify the modal system model defined by (9), (11) and parameterized by (14) from the identified FRFG s (s k ), the following steps are followed. 1) Define weighting filters W (k) as in (18). 2) Perform i SK iterations of the SK algorithm using the mechanical LMFD model with constraints as defined in Section IV-A3.…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…5) Identification Approach: To identify the modal system model defined by (9), (11) and parameterized by (14) from the identified FRFG s (s k ), the following steps are followed. 1) Define weighting filters W (k) as in (18). 2) Perform i SK iterations of the SK algorithm using the mechanical LMFD model with constraints as defined in Section IV-A3.…”
Section: A Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the gain-scheduling control approach [12]- [14], nonlinear systems are controlled by exploiting scheduling variables to switch between LTI controllers. For position-dependent mechanical systems, the relative positioning between individual components can be effectively used as scheduling variables in this approach [15]- [18]. The Linear Parameter-Varying (LPV) control framework formalizes the gain-scheduling method by ensuring stability and performance through a rigorous mathematical approach that strongly relies on accurate system models, [19]- [22].…”
Section: Fixed Worldmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This corollary states that the Nyquist curve lies below a line in the complex plane with slope α and provides a sufficient condition for the closed-loop in Figure 1 to be locally stable for each operating point p. Note that these stability concepts give no guarantees for stability of the closed-loop behavior in Figure 2 for varying p. For that the available information in the frozen FRFs is insufficient and concepts like the global FRF forms presented in [19], [20] might provide stability concepts in the future, but currently theoretical tools are missing for global stability analysis purely on frequency domain data. However, if the scheduling variation is sufficiently slow, stability can be guaranteed in the global sense based on purely local conditions as motivated in [23], however there is no exact characterization of how slow that scheduling variation needs to be.…”
Section: Stabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the identification literature, recent developments have been made towards nonparametric modeling through FRF identification of LPV systems. These developments follow the paths of local identification in [17], [18] and more recently also a global approach to FRF identification of LPV systems has been developed [19]. For an overview of FRF representations of LPV systems see [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The pragmatic approach to obtain (6) is to identify the FRF around different operating points using a local input/output data set, avoiding the need to explicitly find the state-space representation. The FRF can be obtained using a wealth of existing and well-understood techniques [21], [13], or more recent approaches focusing on LPV FRF identification [22], [23].…”
Section: Description Of the Systemmentioning
confidence: 99%