2016
DOI: 10.1101/061267
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Frequency-specific neuromodulation of local and distant connectivity in aging & episodic memory function

Abstract: A growing literature has focused on the brain's ability to augment processing in local regions by recruiting distant communities of neurons in response to neural decline or insult. In particular, both younger and older adult populations recruit bilateral prefrontal cortex (PFC) as a means of compensating for increasing neural effort to maintain successful cognitive function. However, it remains unclear how local changes in neural activity affect the recruitment of this adaptive mechanism. To address this probl… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
22
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

3
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(23 citation statements)
references
References 80 publications
1
22
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Mechanisms for network‐level effects of TMS are not fully understood. Compensation‐oriented explanations propose that networks “compensate” against changes in local activity due to stimulation, such that local excitation of regions with positive connections to a network will result in network connectivity reductions, and vice versa for local inhibition (Cocchi et al, ; Davis, Luber, Murphy, Lisanby, & Cabeza, ; Eldaief et al, ; Fox et al, ; Steel et al, ). θ‐burst is considered inhibitory and iθ‐burst and β‐freq are both considered excitatory, based primarily on cortico‐motor effects (Chen et al, ; Huang et al, ; Pascual‐Leone et al, ), and the parietal area we stimulated has positive connectivity with the HCN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Mechanisms for network‐level effects of TMS are not fully understood. Compensation‐oriented explanations propose that networks “compensate” against changes in local activity due to stimulation, such that local excitation of regions with positive connections to a network will result in network connectivity reductions, and vice versa for local inhibition (Cocchi et al, ; Davis, Luber, Murphy, Lisanby, & Cabeza, ; Eldaief et al, ; Fox et al, ; Steel et al, ). θ‐burst is considered inhibitory and iθ‐burst and β‐freq are both considered excitatory, based primarily on cortico‐motor effects (Chen et al, ; Huang et al, ; Pascual‐Leone et al, ), and the parietal area we stimulated has positive connectivity with the HCN.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…will result in network connectivity reductions, and vice versa for local inhibition (Cocchi et al, 2015;Davis, Luber, Murphy, Lisanby, & Cabeza, 2017;Eldaief et al, 2011;Fox et al, 2012;Steel et al, 2016).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where Ζ ̅ is the mean r-values between nodes of one partition, module, or system (similar to within-266 module degree or WMD), and Ζ ̅ is the mean of r-values between nodes of separate partitions (similar 267 to between-module degree or BMD, Davis et al, 2017). Accordingly, values greater than 0 reflect relatively lower between-system correlations in relation to within-system correlations (i.e., stronger 269 integration of systems), and values less than 0 reflect higher between-system correlations relative to 270 within-system correlations (i.e., diminished integration of systems).…”
Section: Functional Connectivitymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…rTMS therefore provides an ideal means to test the assumption that a localized change in energy to a modal controller could affect a global change in brain states and concomitant behavior. The effects of neuromodulation are typically observed not only in the stimulated site, but also in distal connected regions (Bestmann et al, 2004;Davis et al, 2017;Ruff et al, 2008;Wang et al, 2014;Wang et al, 2018), and thus the controllability framework offers an opportunity to test the hypothesis that network-level activation due to exogenous neuromodulation can be estimated by the network properties of the stimulated site (Muldoon et al, 2016;Spiegler et al, 2016).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%