2020
DOI: 10.1007/s40996-020-00370-4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Fresh and Hardened Properties of 3D High-Strength Printing Concrete and Its Recent Applications

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

3
11
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 25 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
3
11
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the group without AEA, a compressive strength value (~55 MPa) corresponding to the lower limit of high-strength concrete determined by ACI PRC-363-10 [ 93 ] was obtained. In the study conducted by Özalp et al [ 75 ], White Portland 52.5 R-type cement was used and the compressive strength of the 3D printable concrete produced was also close to the strength value found in this study (approx. 60 MPa).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…In the group without AEA, a compressive strength value (~55 MPa) corresponding to the lower limit of high-strength concrete determined by ACI PRC-363-10 [ 93 ] was obtained. In the study conducted by Özalp et al [ 75 ], White Portland 52.5 R-type cement was used and the compressive strength of the 3D printable concrete produced was also close to the strength value found in this study (approx. 60 MPa).…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 87%
“…Open time of the 3D printable cementitious materials can be determined based on the shear stress test, jump table, Vicat apparatus, V-Funnel method, penetration tests, and mini cone. In this study, the open times of the mixtures were determined with the Vicat apparatus, considering the suggestions made by the authors of [ 43 , 72 , 75 ]. In the experiments, 3D printable mortars were filled in the Vicat mould specified in TS EN 196-3 [ 76 ] without rodding then the penetration depths of the needle were measured at certain time intervals and the open times of the mortars were interpreted by using these measurements.…”
Section: Experimental Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite some more sustainable approaches using geopolymeric mortars, 23,[31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38][39][40][41][42] the use of Portland Cement (PC) remains the one with best results: of the 21 studied compositions, 16 mentioned the PC, and 8 specified that used 52.5 R PC class (Figure 1). 4,[44][45][46][47][48][49][50] The choice of a fast-setting and high-strength cement can be justified by characteristics needed for the 3D printing construction process, since it does not have the curing process traditional formwork. It is necessary immediate resistance so that there is no deformation in lower layers due to upper layers weight.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…58,63 River sand was the most used type of aggregate, in 16 of the 21 compositions. The compositions 44,47,59 presented siliceous sand as aggregates. This preference was justified by mechanical strength increase and final finishing possible improvement.…”
Section: Workability / Pumpability Mechanical Strength Extrudability Dimension Conformity Buildabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation