1974
DOI: 10.1016/0043-1648(74)90100-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friction and wear of some engineering materials against hard chromium plating

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
2

Year Published

1978
1978
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
6
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Under 15 N, the wear rate increases also when sliding against LTC treated steel, due to destabilization of the protective iron oxide layer, which forms at the interface between the contacting bodies. When sliding against hard Cr, mild tribo-oxidation takes place under all the tested loads, as typically observed also by other authors [28]. Table 1): wear rates measured on the stationary polymers when sliding against the rotating AISI 316L cylinder (uncoated), as a function of normal load.…”
Section: Dry Sliding Testsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…Under 15 N, the wear rate increases also when sliding against LTC treated steel, due to destabilization of the protective iron oxide layer, which forms at the interface between the contacting bodies. When sliding against hard Cr, mild tribo-oxidation takes place under all the tested loads, as typically observed also by other authors [28]. Table 1): wear rates measured on the stationary polymers when sliding against the rotating AISI 316L cylinder (uncoated), as a function of normal load.…”
Section: Dry Sliding Testsmentioning
confidence: 61%
“…The e¬ect of variations in the asperity radius could be quanti ed by the results of gure 7. However, as there were insu¯cient data in the work of Gologan & Eyre (1974) and no information on typical asperity radii, accurate quanti cation of the e¬ect is not possible. Note that for p=k c < 2:5 the predicted wear rate is negligible as the ratchetting plastic strain generated in the coating at these pressures is negligibly small.…”
Section: Results Of Wear Analyses (A) Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Gologan & Eyre (1974) measured the wear rate of a chromium ®at pin rubbing against a phosphorus bronze alloy in a pin-on-disc test over a range of applied loads. In their experiments, the pin head had a ®at 30 mm 2 contacting area.…”
Section: Results Of Wear Analyses (A) Comparison With Experimental Datamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Formation of pits, gorges and diminishing of micro-dimpling is observed along sliding direction. 52,53 The corresponding wear track is shown in Figure 13(b). Further load increment to 60 N as shown in Figure 13(c) accounts for complete dislodging of surface material in the form of delaminated sheets with a significant reduction in spalling and pit formation.…”
Section: Surface Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%