2010
DOI: 10.1016/j.wear.2009.12.001
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

Friction and wear variations of short carbon fiber (SCF)/PTFE/graphite (10vol.%) filled PEEK: Effects of fiber orientation and nominal contact pressure

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0

Year Published

2011
2011
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(49 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
49
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This leads to the conclusion that thinning of carbon fibers takes place under repeated interaction with asperities. Macroscopically, the thinning of carbon fibers was also reported as a result of sliding of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK composites against steel counterbody [5]. Even in polymer composites reinforced by short carbon fibers, some fibers will lie parallel to the relative sliding direction in tribological contacts.…”
Section: Wear Behavior Of Carbon Fibers Studied By Scratchingmentioning
confidence: 93%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…This leads to the conclusion that thinning of carbon fibers takes place under repeated interaction with asperities. Macroscopically, the thinning of carbon fibers was also reported as a result of sliding of carbon fiber-reinforced PEEK composites against steel counterbody [5]. Even in polymer composites reinforced by short carbon fibers, some fibers will lie parallel to the relative sliding direction in tribological contacts.…”
Section: Wear Behavior Of Carbon Fibers Studied By Scratchingmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Besides the carbon fiber type, the orientation of carbon fibers, no matter continuous carbon fibers (CCF) or short carbon fibers (SCF), has been found to have strong influence on the friction and wear properties of polymeric composites. For example, higher wear resistance of a SCF/PTFE/-graphite (10 vol% for each)-filled PEEK composite was registered under higher pressures (3)(4)(5) when the fibers were oriented perpendicular rather than parallel or normal [5]. Thinning, cracking, and debonding of fibers have been suggested as relevant wear mechanisms in polymeric composites [6][7][8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…As one may notice from literature [23][24][25], the parameters for block-on-ring tests are in a wide range, especially for block dimensions, speed, load and sliding distance. After consulting many reports on this test, the authors considered that a sliding distance of 5000 m is satisfactory for making the friction coefficient and wear stable.…”
Section: Test Methodologymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For turning and grinding finishings, the friction coefficient observed was an average of 0.121 ± 0.007 and 0.109 ± 0.009, respectively; for polishing, it was approximately 0.038 ± 0.005, however for honing it displayed a greater dispersion of the results around 0.088 ± 0.026. Several authors [6,7,11,16,17] have investigated PEEK, as well as its composites, for dry sliding, with friction coefficient variations between 0.3 and 0.5. In the present experiment, the samples submitted to turning and grinding remained within a friction coefficient rate between 0.13 and 0.10, which was defined as boundary regime on Figure 4.…”
Section: Definition Of Test Durationmentioning
confidence: 99%