Proceedings of the 2015 Internet Measurement Conference 2015
DOI: 10.1145/2815675.2815696
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From .academy to .zone

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
4
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
4
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Attackers also leverage new gTLDs for their cyber-attacks. For example, Halvorson et al [20] showed that domain names using new gTLDs are twice as likely to appear on blacklists; this means attackers now actively make use of new gTLDs. Obviously, to keep up with such situations, predator needs to obtain real-time access privileges to highly confidential data inside the each new gTLD's registry.…”
Section: Historic Relationship Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Attackers also leverage new gTLDs for their cyber-attacks. For example, Halvorson et al [20] showed that domain names using new gTLDs are twice as likely to appear on blacklists; this means attackers now actively make use of new gTLDs. Obviously, to keep up with such situations, predator needs to obtain real-time access privileges to highly confidential data inside the each new gTLD's registry.…”
Section: Historic Relationship Approachmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the latter case, they find extensive utilization in monitoring doses received via radiation workers on a routine basis, such as monthly [7,13]. However, the past studies reported a few limitations of commercial TLDs [14,15]. For instance, TLD-100 has low sensitivity and shows superliner behavior of response doses; TLD-100H reveals 25 times higher sensitivity than TLD-100 but still suffers sublinear response doses, which reduce the reading accuracy at a special range of radiation doses.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This expansion of gTLDs by ICANN represented an important development in the evolution of the DNS, and while it brought some benefits for users, businesses, and other stakeholders, it also created new security challenges [38].…”
Section: Dns Hierarchical Entitiesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We focus on this intersection of TLDs that are present in both zone files. Since there is significant variation in the types, history, management, and use of top-level domains [38,86], we classify these TLDs into three categories: ccTLDs (e.g., .jp and .de), gTLDs ("original" gTLDs: .com, .edu, .gov, .mil, .org, .net, .int) and ngTLDs (.tokyo, .xyz, .top).…”
Section: Anycast Adoption By Tldsmentioning
confidence: 99%