1999
DOI: 10.1080/09668139998372
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Adygeya to Yaroslavl: Factors of Party Development in the Regions of Russia, 1995-1998

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
14
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
6
2
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
14
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Note that Russia's regional regimes of the 1990s were not necessarily undemocratic. Some of them closely replicated the national model of disorderly yet rather competitive politics, while others could be viewed as hubs of subnational democracy (Golosov, 1999), which continuously exerted some impact on regional political patterns in the 2000s and thereafter (Obydenkova and Libman, 2013;Libman and Obydenkova, 2014b). However, the bulk of the available evidence clearly indicates that already by the end of the 1990s, deviations from authoritarian rule in the regions became increasingly rare and unusual.…”
Section: Russia's Governors On the Route To Authoritarian Incorporationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Note that Russia's regional regimes of the 1990s were not necessarily undemocratic. Some of them closely replicated the national model of disorderly yet rather competitive politics, while others could be viewed as hubs of subnational democracy (Golosov, 1999), which continuously exerted some impact on regional political patterns in the 2000s and thereafter (Obydenkova and Libman, 2013;Libman and Obydenkova, 2014b). However, the bulk of the available evidence clearly indicates that already by the end of the 1990s, deviations from authoritarian rule in the regions became increasingly rare and unusual.…”
Section: Russia's Governors On the Route To Authoritarian Incorporationmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…Previous studies, some of which have dealt with parties only marginally, have been based upon evidence limited to certain moments in time (Golosov, 1999;Petrov, 1995;Slider, 1996) or to certain regions (Gel'man and Golosov, 1998), or both (Hughes, 1997;Matsuzato, 1997). The technical reason for this narrowness of empirical focus is clear.…”
mentioning
confidence: 98%
“…Winning office is almost solely a conflict among political clans about the distribution of economic and political power in the regions. Golosov (1999) analysed elections for Russia's regional legislatures and found similar patterns of weak political parties and strong patronage networks.…”
Section: Governors and Duma Deputies In Russiamentioning
confidence: 82%