2011
DOI: 10.1016/j.pragma.2010.09.013
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From aspect to evidentiality: The subjectification path of the French semi-copula se faire and its Spanish cognate hacerse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2013
2013
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…7 With the stricter definition along the lines of Aikhenvald (2004) most commonly accepted in typology and grammatical description, and the second interpretation more current in conversation analysis and Interactional Linguistics (Couper-Kuhlen and Selting, 2018). tense/aspect with modal interpretations (Abraham and Leiss, 2008;Brosig, 2015;Hacquard, 2009;Trnavac, 2006b), or evidential ones (Lauwers and Duée, 2011).⁸…”
Section: Engagement In Light Of the Tame-debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…7 With the stricter definition along the lines of Aikhenvald (2004) most commonly accepted in typology and grammatical description, and the second interpretation more current in conversation analysis and Interactional Linguistics (Couper-Kuhlen and Selting, 2018). tense/aspect with modal interpretations (Abraham and Leiss, 2008;Brosig, 2015;Hacquard, 2009;Trnavac, 2006b), or evidential ones (Lauwers and Duée, 2011).⁸…”
Section: Engagement In Light Of the Tame-debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The problems in (9) are exactly the same as the ones Evans et al (2018a,b) diagnose for engagement. They demonstrate that not only it is difficult to define engagement as a discrete (morphological) category, its 8 For further studies on connections between evidentiality and modality see de Haan (1999); Cornillie (2009), among many others; between aspect and evidentiality, see Lau and Rooryck (2017); Lauwers and Duée (2011); Sadanobu and Malchukov (2011); between valency structure and aspect, Spreng (2012); Tenny (1987), or valency structure and evidentiality Ørsnes (2011); between aspect and modality, see Brosig (2015); Gentens (2016); Nara (1999); Trnavac (2006a), between aspect, tense, mood, evidentiality on the one hand and discourse structure on the other, see Fedder and Wagner (2015); Fetzer and Oishi (2014); Hartzler (1983); Hopper (1979); Merlan (1981). 9 For more detailed discussion of this example, see Gentens et al (2019, 7) association with articles and cohesive devices shows that its boundaries stretch even further than the range of structures commonly associated with TAME-categories.…”
Section: Engagement In Light Of the Tame-debatesmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This procedure has been expanded and applied to account for COS verbs in other languages such as French (Dubois and Dubois-Charlier 1997;Saint-Dizier 1999), or Spanish (Demonte 1994;Vázquez et al 2000), as well as in contrastive analyses (Rodríguez Arrizabalaga 2001;Bordignon 2003;Duée and Lauwers 2010;Duée 2011). In general, these studies focus on issues such as the role of the Aktionsart in the event structure (Demonte 1994;Vázquez et al 2000) or the types of syntactic alternations that these COS verbs occur in.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%