2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2020.07.010
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From bench to bedside: 3D reconstruction and printing as a valuable tool for the chest wall surgeon

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 18 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Carfagni et al (2019) fabricated the surgical guides for correction of the PA using FDM technology in ULTEM 1010 material, a biocompatible resin (ISO 10993/USP Class VI) that offers excellent strength and thermal stability such that it can be sterilized by steam autoclaving (a technique commonly used in hospitals) without undergoing deformation. On the other hand, for the fabrication of templates to bend corrective thoracic bars in a controlled and planned manner, the requirement for biocompatibility and sterilizability of materials is not mandatory, so several studies used PLA material for template fabrication (Lin et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019;Bellia-Munzon et al, 2020;Gaspar Pérez et al, 2021). Finally in Bugajski et al (2019), for the realization of a pressure sensor housing to be integrated in a compression bar, the authors evaluated that the yield strength of the material was sufficient to withstand the compression and bending loads to which the bar is subjected, choosing for this purpose ABS as a compatible material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Carfagni et al (2019) fabricated the surgical guides for correction of the PA using FDM technology in ULTEM 1010 material, a biocompatible resin (ISO 10993/USP Class VI) that offers excellent strength and thermal stability such that it can be sterilized by steam autoclaving (a technique commonly used in hospitals) without undergoing deformation. On the other hand, for the fabrication of templates to bend corrective thoracic bars in a controlled and planned manner, the requirement for biocompatibility and sterilizability of materials is not mandatory, so several studies used PLA material for template fabrication (Lin et al, 2018;Huang et al, 2019;Bellia-Munzon et al, 2020;Gaspar Pérez et al, 2021). Finally in Bugajski et al (2019), for the realization of a pressure sensor housing to be integrated in a compression bar, the authors evaluated that the yield strength of the material was sufficient to withstand the compression and bending loads to which the bar is subjected, choosing for this purpose ABS as a compatible material.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The (more or less) invasive surgical procedures for the correction of PE involve the insertion of a metal bar that, as mentioned in section “Current clinical approaches”, is manually shaped by the surgeon in surgical room, at the expense of a difficult prediction of the final shape of the thorax. In order to improve the aesthetic results, in (Lin et al , 2018; Huang et al , 2019; Bellia-Munzon et al , 2020; Gaspar Pérez et al , 2021) was proposed CAD modelling and fabrication with AM techniques of a customized plastic bar template to guide the surgeon in manually shaping the metal bar. Vilaça et al (2014) proposed a method to custom-bend the bar by analyzing CT of the chest through a system called i3DExcavatum.…”
Section: Reverse Engineering and Additive Manufacturing-based Innovat...mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Optimal prints with anatomic match were created in 92.3% ( n = 120); implant rebending was only needed in 5.4% of the patients. They too found a decrease in operation time (87.6 ± 49.9 min compared to 125.4 ± 30.7 min, p < 0.0001) as well as fewer bars used (2.6 ± 0.5 versus 1.7 ± 0.6, p < 0.001) [ 34 ].…”
Section: Discipline Specific Applicationsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Each implant has its own features, and one type may only fit a specific chest wall defect. Some need to be designed and prepared beforehand, and some are very expensive (4)(5)(6)(7)(8). Out of all the reports of chest wall reconstruction, there is no satisfactory, readily available, affordable material and method intended for various defects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%