2012
DOI: 10.5860/crln.73.10.8846
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From bibliometrics to altmetrics: A changing scholarly landscape

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
36
0
4

Year Published

2013
2013
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 59 publications
(40 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
36
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…The focus lately has shifted from informing library decisions on selection and evaluation of printed materials and electronic resources to supporting the analysis and assessment of research output at individual, departmental, and institutional levels (Gumpenberger et al, 2012), although traditional applications to collection development have continued in the United States (Beck & Manuel, 2008) and Australia (Davis, Wilson, & Horn, 2005 (Adams, 2007;Gibbs & Sergeant, 2009;Pan & Breen, 2011) and specialist bibliometrics events (Gumpenberger et al, 2012), Internet resource guides published in practitioner periodicals (Kear & Colbert-Lewis, 2011;Roemer & Borchadt, 2012), and comprehensive LibGuides produced by individual libraries (e.g., Arizona State University, 2012; Macquarie University, 2012; University of Pittsburgh, 2012), along with articles calling for librarians to assume a more strategic role in research evaluation and its management (Herther, 2009;Joint, 2008;MacColl, 2010). Gumpenberger et al (2012, pp.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The focus lately has shifted from informing library decisions on selection and evaluation of printed materials and electronic resources to supporting the analysis and assessment of research output at individual, departmental, and institutional levels (Gumpenberger et al, 2012), although traditional applications to collection development have continued in the United States (Beck & Manuel, 2008) and Australia (Davis, Wilson, & Horn, 2005 (Adams, 2007;Gibbs & Sergeant, 2009;Pan & Breen, 2011) and specialist bibliometrics events (Gumpenberger et al, 2012), Internet resource guides published in practitioner periodicals (Kear & Colbert-Lewis, 2011;Roemer & Borchadt, 2012), and comprehensive LibGuides produced by individual libraries (e.g., Arizona State University, 2012; Macquarie University, 2012; University of Pittsburgh, 2012), along with articles calling for librarians to assume a more strategic role in research evaluation and its management (Herther, 2009;Joint, 2008;MacColl, 2010). Gumpenberger et al (2012, pp.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Os outros indicadores são auto-explicativos. Uma crítica ao sistema se dá por conta de fazer uso de uma base de dados apenas, sendo que existem planos de que ele se integre ao sistema os dados do CiteULike (ROEMER; BORCHARDT, 2012).…”
Section: Fontes De Dados Integração E Ferramentas Altmétricasunclassified
“…As métricas tradicionais geram conflitos principalmente nas fronteiras disciplinares ou em áreas multidisciplinares, onde os resultados destes indicadores podem levar a um severo erro de julgamento, bem como nas especialidades acadêmicas que apresentam nuances ou que sofrem influencia mais direta de blogs e mídias sociais na sua difusão (ROEMER; BORCHARDT, 2012).…”
unclassified
“…An excellent overview of these alternatives can be found in an article by Roemer and Borchadt in C&RL News [21]. Altmetrics is a central hub of information on new metrics.…”
Section: Metrics: the Futurementioning
confidence: 99%