2019
DOI: 10.1029/2019gl084832
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Canopy‐Leaving to Total Canopy Far‐Red Fluorescence Emission for Remote Sensing of Photosynthesis: First Results From TROPOMI

Abstract: Solar‐induced chlorophyll fluorescence (SIF) from the TROPOspheric Monitoring Instrument (TROPOMI), which has substantially improved spatial and temporal resolutions, will improve the global estimations of gross primary production (GPP) than previous satellite SIF data. However, the canopy‐leaving SIF observed by sensors (SIFobs) represents only a portion of the total canopy SIF emission (SIFtotal). This portion is sensitive to the canopy structure and observation direction, resulting in uncertainties in GPP e… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

2
42
0
1

Year Published

2020
2020
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

2
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 61 publications
2
42
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In this study, α is set as 1.21 (Figure 1i) for all pixels for simplicity instead of applying biome‐specific α , which avoid the use of land cover map and its associated uncertainty. The monthly GPP SIF‐CS , GPP SIF‐AS , and GPP SIF‐ASE are integrated over 2019 to obtain yearly averaged GPP values, which are further compared to global GPP from the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM) (Zhang et al, 2017), the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission Level 4 Carbon product (Jones et al, 2017), the FluxSat level 3 product (Joiner et al, 2018), and the Penman‐Monteith‐Leuning (PML) evapotranspiration model (Zhang, 2019; Zhang, Chen, et al, 2019; Zhang, Peña‐Arancibia, et al, 2016). Details about these GPP products can be found in the references cited here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this study, α is set as 1.21 (Figure 1i) for all pixels for simplicity instead of applying biome‐specific α , which avoid the use of land cover map and its associated uncertainty. The monthly GPP SIF‐CS , GPP SIF‐AS , and GPP SIF‐ASE are integrated over 2019 to obtain yearly averaged GPP values, which are further compared to global GPP from the Vegetation Photosynthesis Model (VPM) (Zhang et al, 2017), the Soil Moisture Active Passive (SMAP) mission Level 4 Carbon product (Jones et al, 2017), the FluxSat level 3 product (Joiner et al, 2018), and the Penman‐Monteith‐Leuning (PML) evapotranspiration model (Zhang, 2019; Zhang, Chen, et al, 2019; Zhang, Peña‐Arancibia, et al, 2016). Details about these GPP products can be found in the references cited here.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the contrary, for these configurations with a non-reflecting background spectrum, because there is no more contamination caused by the background reflectance, the estimation accuracy of SIF escape probability was mostly reduced (Figure 6a). However, it should be noted that the above analysis was based on the assumption that G(θ) was fixed to 0.5, as for global-scale remote sensing applications [13,14,25,33], and LAI and CI were set to simulation values (i.e., 'real' value).…”
Section: Influence Of Remotely Sensed I O and Fapar On The Estimationmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, whether or not a universal linear relationship exists across biomes at ecosystem-scale is still an open question [6,10]. Usually, GPP is calculated as the difference between NEE (Net Ecosystem Exchange) and ER (Ecosystem Respiration) [11], while the satellite-observed TOC SIF is calculated based on the directional canopy spectrum [12][13][14]. TOC SIF is only a part of the total emitted SIF of vegetation and is influenced by canopy structure and solar-viewing geometry.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Several approaches have been proposed and/or implemented to more fully account for sun-satellite geometrical dependencies of satellite SIF measurements (e.g., [25,30,[37][38][39][42][43][44][45]52]). These methods rely on various ancillary data including reflectances along with theoretical and/or machine learning constructs (see e.g., [25] for a review).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%