From coherence to coheritization: explaining the rise of policy coherence in EU external policy

Abstract

Over the past decade, the external policy of the European Commission has become increasingly entangled by the notion of policy coherence. Previously 'siloed' policy areas such as trade, agriculture, and development are increasingly approached as challenges only effectively resolved by addressing their positive and negative interlinkages. While the EC is critical of fundamental incoherencies between different policy areas, it simultaneously calls to harness synergies between them. To explain this ambiguous approach, we combine insights from speech act theory and cultural political economy. We aim for methodological triangulation by employing an explanatory narrative, social network analysis, and expert interviews. We argue that the Commission's approach towards coherence can be understood as an attempt to reshape the actor landscape around the discourse on coherence. By gradually pushing out the most outspoken actors, the Commission seeks to discursively resolve the inherent contradictions of reconciling free trade and development of the Global South.

Empirical research on policy integration: a review and new directions

“…This approach is 2019), Koide and Akenji (2017) Network analysis Ties between policy subsystems (issues) and actors e.g. : Metz et al (2020), Schmitz and Eimer (2020) Qualitative comparative analysis (QCA) Necessary and sufficient conditions for policy integration e.g. : Baulenas and Sotirov (2020), Careja (2011), Trein et al (2021a Quantitative text analysis Integration of policy goals into documents e.g.…”