2014
DOI: 10.1515/flin.2014.019
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From compounding to derivation The emergence of derivational affixes through “constructionalization”

Abstract: This article argues that the rise of new derivational affixes can be analyzed adequately as a case of "constructionalization" within the framework of Construction Morphology as developed by Booij (2010). It reviews some aspects and problems of previous accounts that view the emergence of derivational affixes as a case of grammaticalization or as a case of lexicalization, respectively. In line with recent developments in grammaticalization research, not the isolated element (word or affix) is viewed as the locu… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0
1

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6
3
1

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 78 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
7
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Hüning and Booij (2013 (ms)) present a similar analysis of Germanic affixoids being integrated in Germanic compounds, such as the German intensifying element stock ‘lit. stick’, which productively forms part of adjectival compounds such as stockbesoffen ‘very drunk’ and stockconservativ ‘conservative to the core’.…”
Section: A Diachronic-constructional Accountmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Hüning and Booij (2013 (ms)) present a similar analysis of Germanic affixoids being integrated in Germanic compounds, such as the German intensifying element stock ‘lit. stick’, which productively forms part of adjectival compounds such as stockbesoffen ‘very drunk’ and stockconservativ ‘conservative to the core’.…”
Section: A Diachronic-constructional Accountmentioning
confidence: 90%
“…Construction-based accounts of affixoids have appeared for, among other languages, German and Dutch (e.g., Michel 2013, Hüning & Booij 2014, Hartmann 2019, Italian (e.g., Masini & Micheli 2020), Hungarian (Kenesei 2007), Chinese (Arcodia 2011, Arcodia & Basciano 2018, and Aivaliot Greek (Ralli 2019). The particular challenge posed by such formations is their inbetween status: They resemble compounds on the one hand and affixations on the other.…”
Section: Li08ch03_audringmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is why the concept of affixoids, despite Booij's above-cited caveat, enjoys quite some popularity in constructionist approaches to morphology (see e.g. Booij 2010: 57-66;Battefeld 2014;Hüning & Booij 2014;Norde & Van Goethem 2015;Battefeld et al 2018). As Battefeld (2014: 20f.…”
Section: Affixoids and Grammaticalization: Some Theoretical And Termimentioning
confidence: 99%