“…Instead of hardwiring instructions, as was done in the previous version of the PEP model, the new PEP version encodes memory traces of the instructed mappings (i.e., decision-to-key mappings and cue-to-task mappings), as a participant will do via, for instance, memory rehearsal or mental imagery ( Ruge & Wolfensteller, 2010 ; see also, Jeannerod, 2001 ; Jeannerod & Frak, 1999 ; O’Shea & Moran, 2017 ; Theeuwes, Liefooghe, De Schryver, & De Houwer, 2018 ). This allows for automatic retrieval during subsequent execution of the task ( Brass, Liefooghe, Braem, & De Houwer, 2017 ; Martiny-Huenger, Martiny, Parks-Stamm, Pfeiffer, & Gollwitzer, 2017 ). In this way, remembering and implementing instructed stimulus-response mappings and goals can be achieved via the same episodic encoding and retrieval mechanisms used to support event binding and learning through experience, which is consistent with neuroscience work on mental preparation (e.g., Demanet et al, 2016 ; for a review, see Brass et al, 2017 ).…”