2003
DOI: 10.1080/03054980307442
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Constructivism to a Pragmatist Conception of Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
29
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 47 publications
(30 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
1
29
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Indeed, Orit's persistence in seeking clear-cut answers as opposed to my persistence in documenting clear-cut questions, can be interpreted as a situation in which two competing discourses, the 'dilemmatic-knowing that' discourse (conveying the hegemony of abstraction of the Surfacing the tensions of constructivist pedagogy 303 academic world) and the 'problem-solving-knowing how' discourse (representing the concrete world of practice), were struggling to gain prominence on the conversational floor. Orit's conception of knowledge as a testable picture of an independent reality could not reconcile with my constructivist views that there can be no objective assessment of how knowledge fits the world (Kivinen & Ristela, 2003).…”
Section: Examining the Hidden Part Of The Iceberg: Critical Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Indeed, Orit's persistence in seeking clear-cut answers as opposed to my persistence in documenting clear-cut questions, can be interpreted as a situation in which two competing discourses, the 'dilemmatic-knowing that' discourse (conveying the hegemony of abstraction of the Surfacing the tensions of constructivist pedagogy 303 academic world) and the 'problem-solving-knowing how' discourse (representing the concrete world of practice), were struggling to gain prominence on the conversational floor. Orit's conception of knowledge as a testable picture of an independent reality could not reconcile with my constructivist views that there can be no objective assessment of how knowledge fits the world (Kivinen & Ristela, 2003).…”
Section: Examining the Hidden Part Of The Iceberg: Critical Incidentsmentioning
confidence: 96%
“…This kind of 'loop' into both the process of mentoring the group, and the content of the authentic mentoring text, is theoretically grounded in the constructivist assumption that experiencing and introspection into the experience are complementary meaning-making processes. Put differently, thinking about something on the cognitive level can simultaneously direct and evaluate introspection at a meta-cognitive level (Kivinen & Ristela, 2003).…”
Section: Shaping the Iceberg: The Structure Of My Constructivist Pedamentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Although a popular topic in education, constructivism represents a variety of disparate learning theories and pedagogical practices (Kivinen and Ristela, 2003;Phillips, 1995;Prawat, 1996). While some have derided constructivism's benefits and proclaimed its weaknesses (Fox, 2006;Meyer, 2009), others have enthusiastically promoted it (Duffy and Cunningham, 1996;Jonassen et al, 2007;Palincsar, 1998).…”
Section: Constructivism Vs Instructivismmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We would also like to mention that our outlook on university matters and academic life stems from the pragmatist tradition as a general frame of reference, although this article will not discuss pragmatism any further. (See Kivinen 2002;Kivinen andRistela¨2002 and2003. )…”
mentioning
confidence: 95%