2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0737-6782(02)00138-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From experience: applying the risk diagnosing methodology

Abstract: No risk, no reward. Companies must take risks to launch new products speedily and successfully. The ability to diagnose and manage risks is increasingly considered of vital importance in high-risk innovation. This article presents the Risk Diagnosing Methodology (RDM), which aims to identify and evaluate technological, organizational and business risks in product innovation. RDM was initiated, developed and tested within a division of Philips Electronics, a multinational company in the audio, video and lightin… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
49
0
10

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 88 publications
(59 citation statements)
references
References 13 publications
0
49
0
10
Order By: Relevance
“…The organizational and technological complexity of projects can generate enormous risks (Marle and Vidal 2011;Aloini et al 2012;Zou et al 2007;Carr and Tah 2001). Managing risks in every phase is very important to improve project success rates (Bush et al 2005;Keizer et al 2002;Smith and Merritt 2002).…”
Section: Literature Survey Risks Involved In Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The organizational and technological complexity of projects can generate enormous risks (Marle and Vidal 2011;Aloini et al 2012;Zou et al 2007;Carr and Tah 2001). Managing risks in every phase is very important to improve project success rates (Bush et al 2005;Keizer et al 2002;Smith and Merritt 2002).…”
Section: Literature Survey Risks Involved In Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification of the sources of risk in terms of the consequences for the innovative process risk turned out to be important. Keizer et al (2002) developed a list that classified risk determinants in the innovative processes, grouping them into 12 groups as a risk concerning product technology, production, sources of supplies, supply chain, competition, acceptance of consumers, trade agents and social acceptance, project management and organization, in terms of intellectual property, price control, product positioning and brand positioning. The sources of risks were discussed for each group as a list of conditions that have to be met to reduce risks of innovative processes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this paper we presented one risk categorization proposed by Keizer et al [41], which is very important since it is related to new product development. These categories of risk are recognized as critical success factors in product innovation projects.…”
Section: Risk Assessment In Innovation Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Organizational risks refer to internal project management and external organizational influences. Business risks refer to issues such as the impact of a new product on the company's brand positioning, consumer and trade acceptance, commercial viability, and the potential actions of competitors [41].…”
Section: Risk Assessment In Innovation Projectsmentioning
confidence: 99%