2017
DOI: 10.1080/13507486.2017.1307813
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From ‘flight and expulsion’ to migration: contextualizing German victims of forced migration

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0
1

Year Published

2019
2019
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
2
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 19 publications
0
1
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From this position, we also begin to see not just the multiplicity of relational potentials but also the silences contained in discourse. The analysis might, for instance, juxtapose the ‘invasion’ with other measurements, for instance in Germany, that constructed a different world, characterized by the importance of compassion, relying perhaps on a memory of the plight of German refugees following World War II (see Feindt, 2017). A discourse analysis might also examine the power relationships inherent in either, arguing, for instance, that, even at its most humanitarian, the underlying logic is exclusionary and dehumanizing and thus silences the voices of the refugees themselves (Chouliaraki and Stolic, 2017; Musaro, 2017).…”
Section: Expressive Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…From this position, we also begin to see not just the multiplicity of relational potentials but also the silences contained in discourse. The analysis might, for instance, juxtapose the ‘invasion’ with other measurements, for instance in Germany, that constructed a different world, characterized by the importance of compassion, relying perhaps on a memory of the plight of German refugees following World War II (see Feindt, 2017). A discourse analysis might also examine the power relationships inherent in either, arguing, for instance, that, even at its most humanitarian, the underlying logic is exclusionary and dehumanizing and thus silences the voices of the refugees themselves (Chouliaraki and Stolic, 2017; Musaro, 2017).…”
Section: Expressive Measurementmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…15 Varela, 2015. 16 Varela, 2015, p.2 17 García y Valcarcel, 2016Jenkins, 2005;Yang, 2003;Feindt, 2017;Gibbings, 2010;Kleist, 2013;Rothberg y Yildiz, 2011;Gidley, 2013;Werbner, 2002;Witteborn, 2008. pantes, incorporadas en sus identidades y conjugadas con otras experiencias de lucha 18 . Sumado a esto, en el campo de los estudios de memoria en general, ha habido menor producción científica a propósito de las memorias de la acción colectiva 19 y, aquella que sí, lo ha hecho a partir de organizaciones políticas dentro de lo nacional 20 .…”
unclassified