2020
DOI: 10.1002/ar.24412
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From head to hind: Elucidating function through contrasting morphometrics of ancient and modern pedigree dogs

Abstract: Used together, caliper‐ and geometric‐based morphometric analyses provide complimentary approaches to classifying form and function of archaeozoological remains. Here we apply these analytical tools to the skeletal remains of an ancient male dog unearthed from a rural farm settlement of Roman date near present day Warmington, United Kingdom. Our comparisons of the Warmington Roman dog against the morphological characteristics of modern dog breeds enabled us to establish the former's size and shape. It was of m… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
9
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(10 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
1
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, there is no question whether new kinds of dog arrived in Europe during the late Neolithic (Salvolainen et al 2013), and we find that dogs from southern Turkey, northern Iran, Azerbaijan, and Iraq consistently present the closest morphological comparisons to Vindolanda specimens (Bennett & Timm, 2018). , Phillips et al (2009), andSchoenebeck et al (2019) echo our results in finding strong morphological similarities between Romano-British specimens and modern dog breeds whose origins lie in Asia. Horard-Heerbin et al (2014) and Thalmann & Perri (2018) conclude that dogs of paleolithic Europe were probably partially replaced by dogs arriving from the east, and this view is echoed by linguists who note that livestock with novel genetics might have been introduced into Europe, perhaps more than once from the Neolithic onwards, by human populations migrating from the east (Haak et al, 2015).…”
Section: Migration Of Asian Dogs To Europesupporting
confidence: 90%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…However, there is no question whether new kinds of dog arrived in Europe during the late Neolithic (Salvolainen et al 2013), and we find that dogs from southern Turkey, northern Iran, Azerbaijan, and Iraq consistently present the closest morphological comparisons to Vindolanda specimens (Bennett & Timm, 2018). , Phillips et al (2009), andSchoenebeck et al (2019) echo our results in finding strong morphological similarities between Romano-British specimens and modern dog breeds whose origins lie in Asia. Horard-Heerbin et al (2014) and Thalmann & Perri (2018) conclude that dogs of paleolithic Europe were probably partially replaced by dogs arriving from the east, and this view is echoed by linguists who note that livestock with novel genetics might have been introduced into Europe, perhaps more than once from the Neolithic onwards, by human populations migrating from the east (Haak et al, 2015).…”
Section: Migration Of Asian Dogs To Europesupporting
confidence: 90%
“…The high position of the junction between frontal, maxilla, and nasal bones in the Warmington dog (Schoenebeck et al, 2019) is not a cause, but may be a reflection, of its relatively short snout.…”
Section: Analyses Of the Skullmentioning
confidence: 89%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Skulls, which are geometrically more complex objects, are studied in 3D, either directly on the specimens using e.g. a Microscribe digitizer (Drake & Klingenberg, 2008;Geiger et al, 2017;Hanot et al, 2017) or through 3D model reconstruction obtained by CT-scanning (Schoenebeck, Hamilton-Dyer, Baxter, Schwarz, & Nussbaumer, 2021) or photogrammetry (dog: (Ameen et al, 2019)). So far, a single study really takes advantage of a CT-scanning technology to analyze the internal structure of the skull that is the inner ear morphometry (Clavel et al, 2021).…”
Section: Geometric Morphometrics In Archaeophenomicsmentioning
confidence: 99%