2019
DOI: 10.1177/1750481319893771
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

FromadministratortoCEO: Exploring changing representations of hierarchy and prestige in a diachronic corpus of academic management writing

Abstract: We explore the lexical choices made by authors published in Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ), a major academic journal in business and management studies. We do so via a corpus constructed from all the articles published in ASQ from its first publication in 1956 up until the end of 2018. Specifically, our focus is on lexical items that represent social actors. Our findings suggest that, compared with earlier work, recent articles typically ascribe greater status and prestige to organizational elites. Rel… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 13 publications
(8 citation statements)
references
References 38 publications
0
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…As publicly available documents they not only offer an assessment of standards but also indicate the context and focus on inspections and how abstract standards may be interpreted in practice. As Mautner and Learmonth (2020) suggest, these “discursive constructions […] permeate the taken-for-granted assumptions of organisational actors” (2020, p. 275), that is, the way that leadership is discussed in these reports shapes our understanding of leadership. This is not just an academic concern though, these reports are also intended to play an important role in shaping the “purchase decisions” of those that are paying for their own care, forming a critical element of the evidence used in making an informed choice about where to seek care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…As publicly available documents they not only offer an assessment of standards but also indicate the context and focus on inspections and how abstract standards may be interpreted in practice. As Mautner and Learmonth (2020) suggest, these “discursive constructions […] permeate the taken-for-granted assumptions of organisational actors” (2020, p. 275), that is, the way that leadership is discussed in these reports shapes our understanding of leadership. This is not just an academic concern though, these reports are also intended to play an important role in shaping the “purchase decisions” of those that are paying for their own care, forming a critical element of the evidence used in making an informed choice about where to seek care.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Changes in the use of language, noted by Willcocks and Wibberley (2015) are not value-free. Rather, they are important and symbolic, reflecting a control over the nature of the discourse (Mautner and Learmonth, 2020) that derives from the interpretive control that they exercise over the sector. As Black notes, we can shine a light on the “anatomy” of authority by throwing some light on “how interpretive control over the norms (rules, standards, principles) that are written is established and exercised” (2017, p. 287).…”
Section: Role Of the Regulatormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The second example is from the Administrative Science Quarterly (ASQ) corpus, which consists of every article and book review published in the journal from its inception in 1956 through to the end of 2018 (3,547 articles; 19,470,470 tokens) (Mautner and Learmonth, 2020). Table 2 shows the top ten most frequent nouns in the corpus.…”
Section: Rankmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Words are never innocent after all, and as Mautner and Learmonth (2020, p. 277) argue, ‘“labels” for social actors, whether leader [or any other]. .…”
Section: The Ubiquitous ‘Leader’mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This everyday power seems both to have shifted and been enabled by the shift towards public discourse which has framed organizational phenomena in increasingly positive terms. In this context, a semantic drift towards a preference for ‘leaders’ can be seen as part of wider trends that depict organizational life in ways that suggest positive cultural valences (Mautner & Learmonth, 2020).…”
Section: The Language Of ‘Leadership’ Exemplifying Neoliberalismmentioning
confidence: 99%