From integrated aims to fragmented outcomes: urban intensification and transportation planning in the Netherlands

Context-Adapted Urban Planning for Rapid Transitioning of Personal Mobility towards Sustainability: A Systematic Literature Review

“…This network of authors is coming from five different countries (with the majority from the United Kingdom) and have diverse expertise: planning, geography, environmental science, social science, and transport science. All together, they create a multidiscipline thought collective that focused on topics discussed above: accessibility [188] and "mobility environments"-another way of combining land-use and mobility planning [97], planning for sustainable mobility [111], challenges of interpretation of goals into indicators [189], dialogue processes among stakeholders [190] and, related to that, integration and creation of knowledge [191]. In several articles, the researchers mention the need for behavioural change and policy implementation in order to create a modal shift away from the current dominance of private cars [192].…”

Mobility nodes and economic spaces: Links, tensions and planning implications

“…It is therefore crucial to situate the tradingtransport nexus in the broader transport and land-use discourse. The literature has acknowledged the transport and land use or TLU relationship (Banister, 2008;Acheampong & Silva, 2015;Duffhues & Bertolini, 2016), which is conceptualised as a transport-land use feedback cycle (Duffhues & Bertolini, 2016) and land use and transportation interaction (Acheampong & Silva, 2015). However, there is difficulty in isolating and measuring the mechanisms through which transport and land use affect each other since other socio-spatial forces such as demographic, economic and policy issues shape how the two systems operate (Lundqvist, 2003;Wegener, 2004;Acheampong & Silva, 2015).…”

“…There is also a need to examine how social issues and political realities shape land-use patterns and transport (Waddell, 2011). On a more pragmatic level, attentiveness to socio-political relations helps address the institutional barriers to the implementation of plans for transport and land use integration (UN Habitat, 2009;Duffhues & Bertolini, 2016).…”

Synergies from Improved Cycling-Transit Integration

“…Where such effects are occurring at the lower scale of rapid transit services and the increasingly popular (urban) destinations they connect to, the bicycle is a means to connect extended catchment areas between 1 and (at least) 5 km around rapid transit stops, in turn feeding the rapid services, their stations and connected destinations and thus closing the feedback loop (cf. Wegener, 1999;Duffhues and Bertolini, 2016). The effects: First of all, higher transit competitiveness maintained over extended areas increases the likelihood of individuals using it for a higher share of their travel needs, or in being less likely to shift away from it.…”