This paper combines theoretical resources from Bourdieusian and critical realist scholarship to explore qualitative data about the networking practices of 25 self-employed and entrepreneurial human resource consultants. The analysis, which concentrates on a regional economic field in the UK, assesses (i) how the field was structured to support entrepreneurial careers (socio-economic structure) and (ii) how these consultants differentially enacted and experienced relations within this field (entrepreneurial agency). Concepts taken from critical realism are used to deconstruct the field in terms of its constituent parts, or field elements, and concepts taken from Bourdieu are used to reconstruct these parts in terms of their resources and local agential struggles. Field elements were also analysed in terms of their (critical realist) institutions and (Bourdieusian) doxa, and in terms of (Bourdieusian) habitus and (critical realist) reflexive imperatives. We argue that the form of analysis which develops, which we call Realist Bourdieusian Analysis, reveals more about the causal properties of the field than forms of analyses that are limited to the Bourdieusian lexicon, and so additions from critical realism enrich our understanding of fields and, agents' relations and experiences within the field. More specifically, the analysis reveals a field constituted of a complex normative geography, which consultants navigate through reflexive struggles in relation to a range of field elements with which they were engaged. The analysis concludes by highlighting the practical, theoretical, methodological contributions of this research.