2003
DOI: 10.1016/s0040-5809(03)00076-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From local interactions to population dynamics in site-based models of ecology

Abstract: A central problem in ecology is relating the interactions of individuals-described in terms of competition, predation, interference, etc.-to the dynamics of the populations of these individuals-in terms of change in numbers of individuals over time. Here, we address this problem for a class of site-based ecological models, where local interactions between individuals take place at a finite number of discrete resource sites over non-overlapping generations and, between generations, individuals move randomly bet… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
43
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 37 publications
(43 citation statements)
references
References 44 publications
0
43
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case where there is no environmental noise Johansson & Sumpter (2003) have shown that the population dynamics of the model are well-approximated by the stochastic dynamical system…”
Section: Testing the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case where there is no environmental noise Johansson & Sumpter (2003) have shown that the population dynamics of the model are well-approximated by the stochastic dynamical system…”
Section: Testing the Modelsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We know relatively little about the underlying mechanisms that create the discrete-time maps (see e.g. Gyllenberg et al 1997;Gamarra and Sole 2002;Johansson and Sumpter 2003;Thieme 2003;Geritz and Kisdi 2004;Eskola and Geritz 2007;Eskola and Parvinen 2007 for mechanistic underpinnings of various discrete-time models), and therefore we don't have a priori constraints on the convexity of f. Empirical data are usually too noisy to ascertain the precise shape of f. There is thus no ground for narrowing research to the few famous discrete-time population models. As the present study also underlines, it is dangerous to overuse just a few models, because results based on them may not carry over to other models.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If P is the size of the parasite, then the probability of the host escaping parasitism is given by (2) with x = γ · P , where γ is the attack rate of the parasitoid, and κ is the aggregate parameter of the parasitoid. In addition to parasitism, and individual fitness, the framework of kappa function may include the Allee effect phenomenon as was pointed out by Johansson and Sumpter [2003]. This may be done by requiring, for example, that two or more individuals are needed per resource site for offspring to be produced.…”
Section: H T+1 = H T · G(h T ) G(h T ) = U(h T ) · R(h T ) · I(h T )mentioning
confidence: 99%