2020
DOI: 10.1080/09546553.2020.1788544
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Myths of Victimhood to Fantasies of Violence: How Far-Right Narratives of Imperilment Work

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
17
0
2

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 39 publications
(19 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
17
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Gab functions mainly as a space for a heterogeneous far-right to coalesce as a community of grievance in the face of perceived techno-social persecution by "Big Tech". While victimhood claims have been elsewhere identified as part of a powerful affective bond in white supremacist and broader far-right communities (Berbrier, 2000;Marcks and Pawelz, 2020;Oaten, 2014), we find that alongside "white victimhood," there is a platform-specific sense of persecution underpinning far-right community formation on Gab. Further, in contrast to previous work on far-right virtual communities, which emphasise the importance of offline stigmatization to community formation (De Koster and Houtman, 2008), we find that it is a particularly online sense of stigma which unifies users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Gab functions mainly as a space for a heterogeneous far-right to coalesce as a community of grievance in the face of perceived techno-social persecution by "Big Tech". While victimhood claims have been elsewhere identified as part of a powerful affective bond in white supremacist and broader far-right communities (Berbrier, 2000;Marcks and Pawelz, 2020;Oaten, 2014), we find that alongside "white victimhood," there is a platform-specific sense of persecution underpinning far-right community formation on Gab. Further, in contrast to previous work on far-right virtual communities, which emphasise the importance of offline stigmatization to community formation (De Koster and Houtman, 2008), we find that it is a particularly online sense of stigma which unifies users.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 53%
“…Second, there are similarities between the argumentative structures and approaches of rightwing radicals and conspiracy theorists. Right-wing radicals tend to support their views with presumed scientific knowledge (Lanzke, 2016;Marcks & Pawelz, 2020), which can also be found among conspiracy theorists (Butter, 2020). In addition, right-wing radicals support their arguments by focusing on personal and emotional narratives, feelings, or experiences and exploit topics like child abuse (Lanzke, 2016) in a similar way as conspiracy theorists do (Butter, 2020).…”
Section: Political Attitudes: Right-wing Radicalism As Cause?mentioning
confidence: 79%
“…The specifics of the “Covid-19 crisis” propagated by German RPAs was expressed in a cult of violence. This was not only directed at minority groups—specifically, the racialized and gendered Others broadly discussed in the scholarly literature (e.g., Vieten 2020 ; Marcks and Pawelz 2022 )—but also aimed at amplifying the irreconcilable differences between the “native” people versus “antidemocratic” elites. In this way, RPAs stimulated violence toward the center of the civil sphere, expressing it in the aforementioned attacks against governmental authorities, the police and its civil institutions, inter alia , media and research institutes.…”
Section: Empirical Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%