2014
DOI: 10.1177/0267658314537291
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From number agreement to the subjunctive: Evidence for Processability Theory in L2 Spanish

Abstract: This article contributes to typological plausibility of Processability Theory (PT) (Pienemann, 1998, 2005) by providing empirical data that show that the stages predicted by PT are followed in the second language (L2) acquisition of Spanish syntax and morphology. In the present article, the PT stages for L2 Spanish morphology and syntax are first hypothesized after a brief description of PT theory. The results of a corpus of conversational data by L2 Spanish learners ( n = 21) are then presented. Implicational… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
19
0

Year Published

2015
2015
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
2

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 30 publications
3
19
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The validity of this PT prediction has been recognized not only among languages that are typologically similar to the target language, such as German L2 with Swedish L1 (Håkansson, Pienemann, & Sayehli, 2002) and Spanish L2 with English L1 (Bonilla, 2014), but also among typologically different languages such as Arabic L2 with English L1 (Mansouri, 2005), Chinese L2 with English L1 (Zhang, 2005), and Japanese L2 with English L1 (Di Biase & Kawaguchi, 2002;Kawaguchi, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of Ptmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…The validity of this PT prediction has been recognized not only among languages that are typologically similar to the target language, such as German L2 with Swedish L1 (Håkansson, Pienemann, & Sayehli, 2002) and Spanish L2 with English L1 (Bonilla, 2014), but also among typologically different languages such as Arabic L2 with English L1 (Mansouri, 2005), Chinese L2 with English L1 (Zhang, 2005), and Japanese L2 with English L1 (Di Biase & Kawaguchi, 2002;Kawaguchi, 2005).…”
Section: Theoretical Framework Of Ptmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Evidence for the existence of developmental sequences is long-standing and robust (for review, see Ortega, 2009). They have been documented in a variety of typologically different L2s (e.g., Bettoni & Di Biase, 2015; Bonilla, 2015; Johnston, 1997; Pienemann, 2005), as has the failure of instruction to alter them (R. Ellis, 1989; Håkansson & Norrby, 2010; Mackey, 1999; Pienemann, 1984).…”
Section: Alleged Problems With Tblt's Psycholinguistic Rationalementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Further evidence for PT's predicted stages can be found by examining number agreement. For example, in L2 Spanish (Bonilla, 2015) English-L2 Spanish learners (beginner, intermediate, and advanced each n = 7). Learners completed a picture description task and oral interview.…”
Section: Processability Theory and L2 Gender Agreementmentioning
confidence: 99%