This paper sets out some of the findings of an Oxford Brookes University research project on communication styles in post-16 teaching. It shows how the communication styles of teachers on GNVQ programmes are different to those of teachers on BTEC or 'A' level programmes, being perceived by learners as higher in leadership and warm/understanding behaviours. The paper goes on to argue that, even in GNVQ programmes, there is little learner autonomy and that the challenge of new, more "connective" curriculum models needs to be faced, especially through the development of more communicative classrooms. In 1991, a British government White Paper, Education and Training for the 21st Century, introduced a new qualification, the General National Vocational Qualification (GNVQ). GNVQs are intended to provide a broad-based vocational education, combining core skills in Communication, Information Technology and Application of Number, with vocational studies. They are aimed primarily at 16-19-year-old students and should lead either to employment or to higher education. GNVQs are outcome-based, that is, what learners need to achieve is stated explicitly so that they can gather evidence of achievement; and are intended to encourage learner autonomy through "pro-active student-centred learning" (The National Council for Vocational Qualifications [NCVQl guidance, Oates, 1994). If GNVQs are implemented as intended, they should give rise to a different experience for learners than traditional academic learning programmes, such as 'A' levels, and existing vocational programmes, such as Business & Technology Education Council (BTEC) certificates and diplomas. More recently, the Dearing review of 16-19 education (Dearing, 1996) has renamed GNVQs, Applied 'A' levels, but the characteristics described will remain. The fundamental questions which the present research addresses are, do the new GNVQ/Applied 'A' level qualifications in fact give rise to greater