2004
DOI: 10.1207/s15327973rlsi3701_3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Observation to Transcription and Back: Theory, Practice, and Interpretation in the Analysis of Children's Naturally Occurring Discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
23
0
1

Year Published

2015
2015
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 83 publications
(24 citation statements)
references
References 27 publications
0
23
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Immediately after the interview, the interviewer filled in additional detail and information into the REDCap report form. Taking detailed notes during the interview produced a chronological recording of what was said in the form of indirect or "soft" quotes (i.e., what the interviewer recalls the participant said verbatim), while the notes added immediately after the interview provided a synthesized summary of the interview (Hamo, Blum-Kulka, & Hacohen, 2004). Taking notes during and immediately after the interview, as well as using both a hands free device and computer-generated report forms, minimizes any data loss that may be associated with the use of field notes alone (Kieren & Munro, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Immediately after the interview, the interviewer filled in additional detail and information into the REDCap report form. Taking detailed notes during the interview produced a chronological recording of what was said in the form of indirect or "soft" quotes (i.e., what the interviewer recalls the participant said verbatim), while the notes added immediately after the interview provided a synthesized summary of the interview (Hamo, Blum-Kulka, & Hacohen, 2004). Taking notes during and immediately after the interview, as well as using both a hands free device and computer-generated report forms, minimizes any data loss that may be associated with the use of field notes alone (Kieren & Munro, 1985).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Rather, as analytic tools, transcriptions are inevitably incomplete and selective representations of what transpired, and are influenced by the researcher's interests and other limitations (Evaldsson, 2004;C. Goodwin, 1994;Hamo, Blum-Kulka, & Hacohen, 2004;Jefferson, 2004, p. 15). Specifically concerning video recordings, Brun-Cottan (1990, p. 294) described transcriptions as "partial flat copies .…”
Section: Representing and Transcribing Embodiment: Possibilities And mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Actually, often authors state that transcriptions, even when arising from video-recorded data, are based on Gail Jefferson's system for CA, even though Jefferson did not consider embodiment. Also, discussions of transcription, including in ROLSI (Hamo et al, 2004;and recently Auer, 2014;Walker, 2014), mostly focus on talk. In this section I first cover briefly some possibilities for representing and transcribing embodiment, without intending to provide a how-to guide, 14 and then explore two aspects and their analytic challenges, these being temporality and manner.…”
Section: Representing and Transcribing Embodiment: Possibilities And mentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Knoblauch, 2012). While Hamo (2004) points out that "a tape -both audio and video -can never record an interaction completely" (p. 77), Sacks (1984) asserts that video recordings are a "'good enough' record of what happened" (p. 26). Video recordings document social interactions in real-time, capturing much of the verbal and nonverbal interactions that are impossible to capture using field notes alone (Silverman, 2009).…”
Section: Video Recording and Screen Capturingmentioning
confidence: 99%