2021
DOI: 10.1080/1828051x.2021.1972852
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From phenotypical to genomic characterisation of the mannara dog: an italian shepherd canine resource

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

4
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Since the CI is a continuous variable across skull shapes (Drake & Klingenberg, 2008; Roberts et al, 2010; Stone et al, 2016) and different values of this index are being used to mark the transition between two skull‐type classes (e.g. Bognár et al, 2021; Liotta et al 2021), we added two transition classes and classified as follows: skull type 1 (dolichocephalic, CI < 48), skull type 2 (mildly dolichocephalic, CI between 48 and 51), skull type 3 (mesaticephalic, CI between 52 and 69), skull type 4 (mildly brachycephalic, CI between 70 and 75), skull type 5 (brachycephalic, CI > 75). The values of the CI were based on measurements published by McGreevy et al (2013), Stone et al (2016), and own measurements on skull collections in the faculty's museum of Morphology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since the CI is a continuous variable across skull shapes (Drake & Klingenberg, 2008; Roberts et al, 2010; Stone et al, 2016) and different values of this index are being used to mark the transition between two skull‐type classes (e.g. Bognár et al, 2021; Liotta et al 2021), we added two transition classes and classified as follows: skull type 1 (dolichocephalic, CI < 48), skull type 2 (mildly dolichocephalic, CI between 48 and 51), skull type 3 (mesaticephalic, CI between 52 and 69), skull type 4 (mildly brachycephalic, CI between 70 and 75), skull type 5 (brachycephalic, CI > 75). The values of the CI were based on measurements published by McGreevy et al (2013), Stone et al (2016), and own measurements on skull collections in the faculty's museum of Morphology.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the literature, only a few genomic studies focused on the Italian shepherd dog breeds, mostly based on microsatellites [ 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 ] or on the identification of genes specifically related to sheepdogs [ 14 , 15 ]. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to investigate the genomic regions that best differentiate and characterise Italian herding and livestock guardian shepherd dogs genotyped with a high-density SNP chip.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To limit this problem, it is of great importance to solve the disagreements between breeders and the kennel club, for example, improving the role and the responsibility of the breed club and the livestock keepers, which actually deal with the preservation activities over time, and creating accurate mating plans and exchanging of dogs between breeders that share a common vision of the breed. Another suggestion might be to follow the successful example of other breed clubs, including the Mannara dog breed club [41], establishing a roving commission of ENCI judges who personally visit the farms of the rural areas where the possible founder dogs live, giving the opportunity to increase the total and breeding population size. This direct contact with the breeders would also allow them to collect their concerns about the management and vision of the breed, and thus improve the breed standard like it was a "participatory project", it being, in fact, a dynamic document that should evolve accordingly with the population.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%