2004
DOI: 10.1016/j.isprsjprs.2004.02.003
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From point-based to feature-based aerial triangulation

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
45
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 64 publications
(45 citation statements)
references
References 4 publications
0
45
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Methods can also be differentiated based on which image features they use for matching. Some authors propose points (Ding & Zakhor 2008, Avbelj et al 2010), but most works consider lines as more natural for building structures and use them for co-registration (Debevec 1996, Früh et al 2004, Schenk 2004, Eugster & Nebiker 2009). In some papers hybrid methods employing points and lines at the same time are presented (Zhang et al 2005, Tian et al 2008).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Methods can also be differentiated based on which image features they use for matching. Some authors propose points (Ding & Zakhor 2008, Avbelj et al 2010), but most works consider lines as more natural for building structures and use them for co-registration (Debevec 1996, Früh et al 2004, Schenk 2004, Eugster & Nebiker 2009). In some papers hybrid methods employing points and lines at the same time are presented (Zhang et al 2005, Tian et al 2008).…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand linear structures are more suitable than points to represent building, on the other hand they are more difficult to represent, especially in 3D using e.g. parameterization with two angles and two coordinates (Schenk, 2004 or Plücker coordinates. Such representation leads to more complicated projection matrix than projection matrix for points.…”
Section: Model-to-image Matchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Since a 3D line only has 4 degrees of freedom, we can search for a proper representation to deal with uncertain transformations. Minimal representations used in (Roberts, 1988), (Schenk, 2004) and (Bartoli and Sturm, 2005) inspired the representation proposed in 3.2.…”
Section: A State Of the Artmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Some examples can be found in Malmström (1986), Tommaselli and Tozzi (1996), Heipke (1997), Schenk (2004), Fraser et al (2001), Marcato Junior and, among others.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%