2014
DOI: 10.1057/biosoc.2014.4
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From ‘politics of numbers’ to ‘politics of singularisation’: Patients’ activism and engagement in research on rare diseases in France and Portugal

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

3
33
0
14

Year Published

2015
2015
2021
2021

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 35 publications
3
33
0
14
Order By: Relevance
“…However, the majority of the organizations we spoke with were more concerned with producing or analyzing personally relevant genomic research questions or information that they saw as posing a direct challenge to the established hierarchy of knowledge, opening opportunities to participate in (and benefit from) genomic research on their own terms. Our findings are more in line with Rabeharisoa et al (2014b) who found that the epidemiologicbased goal of 'generalizability' did not resonate with members of rare disease patient advocacy groups. Instead, they were motivated by what the authors label as a ''politics of singularisation,'' which allows them to share the specificities of their situations while still joining together collectively and in fact wishes to capitalize on those experiences rather follow a logic of numbers, where research benefits are only accrued based on sufficient sample sizes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…However, the majority of the organizations we spoke with were more concerned with producing or analyzing personally relevant genomic research questions or information that they saw as posing a direct challenge to the established hierarchy of knowledge, opening opportunities to participate in (and benefit from) genomic research on their own terms. Our findings are more in line with Rabeharisoa et al (2014b) who found that the epidemiologicbased goal of 'generalizability' did not resonate with members of rare disease patient advocacy groups. Instead, they were motivated by what the authors label as a ''politics of singularisation,'' which allows them to share the specificities of their situations while still joining together collectively and in fact wishes to capitalize on those experiences rather follow a logic of numbers, where research benefits are only accrued based on sufficient sample sizes.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 88%
“…Lógicas distintas permeiam as percepções de risco e responsabilidade. O que talvez podemos apontar como elemento comum é a valorização da família como núcleo do cuidado, e seu papel central no campo político e social na busca por direitos em saúde que atendam as especificidades das pessoas com doenças raras [31][32][33] . Isso não difere muito de outras condições crônicas de adoecimento que têm na família o suporte para o cuidado, como evidenciado em algumas pesquisas [34][35][36] .…”
Section: Família E Sofrimentos De Longa Duraçãounclassified
“…Thus, for example, in the United States in the 80s and in Europe in the 90s certain patients' organizations helped to take care of social justice and fairness regarding questions on RDs (Rabeharisoa et al, 2014). Both in the USA, with the National Organization for Rare Disorders (NORD) and in Europe, with the European Organization for Rare Disorders (EURORDIS), these organizations have influenced policy in their respective countries.…”
Section: Rare Disordersmentioning
confidence: 99%