2019
DOI: 10.5038/2379-9951.4.1.1091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From Rigor to Vigor: The Past, Present, and Potential of Inquiry as Stance

Abstract: Over the years, practitioner research has been both marginalized and trivialized within the larger educational research landscape. This article challenges that exclusion by tracing the emergence and development of the inquiry stance construct. Understanding the origins of teacher inquiry can contribute to its cultivation and ultimately lend a necessary rigor-or better yet, vigor-to practitioner research. Indeed, inquiry as stance endures because it is far more than a best practice or ready-made technique. Deep… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The teacher's role in this procedure is complex and requires further investigation. Nevertheless, adopting an inquiring stance (Currin, 2019) enables educators to transform their teaching toward a more student-centric and participatory classroom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The teacher's role in this procedure is complex and requires further investigation. Nevertheless, adopting an inquiring stance (Currin, 2019) enables educators to transform their teaching toward a more student-centric and participatory classroom.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In this section, I outline a vision of practitioner inquiry that guided this research. I then position practitioner inquiry as an empowering force for teachers in the age of accountability (Currin, 2019). In doing so, I hope to highlight the idealized vision of what practitioner inquiry can and should be in order to contrast that ideal to the findings of this study.…”
Section: Conceptual Frameworkmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…This variation can complicate efforts to define practitioner research, especially for novice researchers such as graduate students. However, there is widespread agreement with Cochran-Smith and Lytle's conceptualization of practitioner research as systematic and intentional (Currin, 2019;Dana & Yendol-Hoppey, 2020;Miller & Shinas, 2019;Schaenen et al, 2012;Schroeder, 2020;Stremmel, 2007). Furthermore, empirical practitioner research differs from other types of practitioner research in that it involves the systematic collection and analysis of data (Cochran-Smith & Lytle, 1993) and is intentional and more visible than reflection, a practice teachers engage in every day (Dana & Yendol-Hoppey, 2020).…”
Section: Terminologymentioning
confidence: 95%