From scientific practice to high school science classrooms: Transfer of scientific technologies and realizations of authentic inquiry

Abstract

The Biology Workbench (BW) is a web‐based tool enabling scientists to search a wide array of protein and nucleic acid sequence databases with integrated access to a variety of analysis and modeling tools. The present study examined the development of this scientific tool and its consequent adoption into the context of high school science teaching in the form of the Biology Student Workbench (BSW). Participants included scientists, programmers, science educators, and science teachers who played key roles along the pathway of the design and development of BW, and/or the adaptation and implementation of BSW in high school science classrooms. Participants also included four teachers who, with their students, continue to use BSW. Data sources included interviews, classroom observations, and relevant artifacts. Contrary to what often is advocated as a major benefit accruing from the integration of authentic scientific tools into precollege science teaching, classroom enactments of BSW lacked elements of inquiry and were teacher‐centered with prescribed convergent activities. Students mostly were preoccupied with following instructions and a focus on science content. The desired and actual realizations of BSW fell on two extremes that reflected the disparity between scientists' and educators' views on science, inquiry science teaching, and the related roles of technological tools. Research on large‐scale adoptions of technological tools into precollege science classrooms needs to expand beyond its current focus on teacher knowledge, skills, beliefs, and practices to examine the role of the scientists, researchers, and teacher educators who often are involved in such adoptions. © 2010 Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Res Sci Teach 48: 37–70, 2011

Investigations of a complex, realistic task: Intentional, unsystematic, and exhaustive experimenters

“…Intentional experimenters were able to conduct appropriate controlled comparisons, interpret outcomes, combine their findings, and reach valid conclusions, but they constituted only one quarter of our student groups in high school physics. The small number of students who conducted sophisticated experiments in Airbags likely reflects the dearth of opportunities students have to explore complex problems during their regular classroom instruction and the tendency for students to focus on following directions rather than engaging in authentic inquiry activities (Waight & Abd‐El‐Khalick, 2011).…”

Una controversia de la Historia de la Tecnología para aprender sobre Naturaleza de la Tecnología: Tesla vs. Edison – La guerra de las corrientes

“…Waight y Abd-El- Khalick (2011Khalick ( , 2012 destacan seis dimensiones fundamentales de la NDT basándose en la filosofía de la tecnología: (i) el papel de la cultura y los valores; (ii) el progreso tecnoló-gico; (iii) la tecnología como parte de sistemas; (iv) la difusión de tecnologías; (v) la tecnología como «panacea» para solucionar problemas; y (vi) la pericia o experticia tecnológica.…”

A case for examining pre-service teacher preparation for inquiry teaching science with technology

“…The arrival and rapid evolution of so many varieties of tools (e.g., computers, tablets, simulations, peripherals) have convoluted the landscape for science teachers because there has been gross neglect for professional development (Cuban 2001;Oppenheimer 2004) and a variety of contextual influences on implementation so that teachers are not sure where to use tools in the curriculum, what tools to use and how to use them (McCrory 2008;Waight and Abd-El-Khalick 2011). When introducing technology into science lessons, teachers and teacher educators alike confess their lack of knowledge, their needs and their interest in learning more to teach technology better (Settlage, Odom, and Pedersen 2004).…”