From state agencies to ordinary citizens: reframing risk-mitigation investments and their impact to disrupt urban risk traps in Lima, Peru

Abstract

The understanding of linkages between disaster risk and urban development has seen important advances in recent decades. However, it falls short in addressing the production and reproduction of so-called urban "risk traps", which are accumulation cycles of everyday risks and small-scale disasters with highly localized impacts, particularly on impoverished urban dwellers. Drawing on the action-research project cLIMA sin Riesgo, this paper examines risk-mitigating investment actions of state agencies, residents and communities in Barrios Altos, in the historic centre of Lima, Peru, and José Carlos Mariátegui, in the periphery. The analysis shows that residents tend to be caught in risk traps not necessarily due to lacking investments, but paradoxically despite them and their unintended effects. Furthermore, accumulated fragmented investments erode the capacity to act of those at risk and perpetuate risk accumulation cycles. The paper argues for a re-assessment of riskmitigation investments and their intended and unintended consequences, and suggests routes to address current shortcomings in order to disrupt "risk traps". KEYWORDS capacity to act / everyday risk / just and resilient cities / Lima / risk-mitigation investments / urban risk traps

Community water governance for urban water security in the Global South: Status, lessons, and prospects

“…Most areas with poor access tended to be poor, peri‐urban or informal areas where poor urban planning and exclusion from piped systems increased water‐supply costs, and water tariffs were historically high (Adams & Zulu, 2015; Adegun, 2015; N. Ahmed & Sohail, 2003; Al'Afghani et al, 2019). Where piped water is available, several studies pointed to unreliable supply due to high demand and low water pressure (Allen et al, 2017; Dill, 2010; Sally et al, 2014; Velzeboer et al, 2018). Other access‐based challenges that inspired community involvement were high rates of “lost” or nonrevenue water (Kifanyi, Shayo, & Ndambuki, 2013; Nganyanyuka, Martinez, Wesselink, Lungo, & Georgiadou, 2014).…”

Nature-Based Solutions in Latin American Cities

“…One-third of the Peruvian population, or 9,174,855 inhabitants, live in Metropolitan Lima (Allen et al 2017;INEI 2017). Lima is located in the province of Lima and also in the department of Lima.…”

“…The city is considered the second most populated desert metropolis worldwide, after Cairothere is less than 10 mm of annual mean precipitation (Ioris 2017). Lima's natural ecosystem is composed of wetlands, rivers, marine coastal environments, Andean hills formation, and Lomas (Allen et al 2017).…”

“…Several authors have underlined the importance of public participation in NbS design and implementation (Allen 2017;Cohen-Shacham et al 2016;Escobedo et al 2018;FAO 2016; to ensure that NbS reflect the wishes of the public, to align with community values, and to ensure community stewardship, or, in other words, encourage the public to take responsibility for the governance of public goods and help transform spaces into places. Correspondingly, public participation was indicated as one of the main requirements to implement NbS in Bogotá and Lima (Fig.…”

Understanding and researching urban extreme poverty: a conceptual–methodological approach

“…Drawing then on our first step, the material draws attention to the often makeshift infrastructure and self-built housing made from improvised materials, as well as the everyday risks such as landslides and rockfalls that characterize life in the settlement. The economic points towards the precarious employment situation of many of the residents, the economic consequences of community efforts to mitigate everyday risk, (32) and the vulnerability of those with lowest access to water to exploitation through markets -residents without access to water in their homes pay up to ten times as much per litre to purchase water from delivery trucks. (85) The political dimension encourages us to consider issues of political voice and the distribution of resources; despite being home to around ten percent of the urban population, San Juan de Lurigancho received only 3.8% of the total risk-mitigation investment made across the whole of Metropolitan Lima from 2011-2015.…”