2017
DOI: 10.1162/netn_a_00011
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From static to temporal network theory: Applications to functional brain connectivity

Abstract: Network neuroscience has become an established paradigm to tackle questions related to the functional and structural connectome of the brain. Recently, interest has been growing in examining the temporal dynamics of the brain’s network activity. Although different approaches to capturing fluctuations in brain connectivity have been proposed, there have been few attempts to quantify these fluctuations using temporal network theory. This theory is an extension of network theory that has been successfully applied… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
5
3
2

Relationship

3
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 91 publications
(75 citation statements)
references
References 120 publications
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Our results elucidate the fastevolving events with regard to subnetwork integration and segregation that occur in an epoch-related task fMRI experiment. Our findings suggest that minute changes in subnetwork integration are of importance for task performance.resolution [24]. The Power parcellation of the brain was used and the following ten subnetworks were studied (following the Cole et al, 2013 network template [25]): DMNdefault mode, SM -sensorimotor, VIS -visual, FP -fronto-parietal attention, SAsaliency, CO -cingulo-opercular, AU -auditory, Sub -subcortical, DA -dorsal attention and VA -ventral attention subnetwork [26].Our aim with the current study was two-fold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Our results elucidate the fastevolving events with regard to subnetwork integration and segregation that occur in an epoch-related task fMRI experiment. Our findings suggest that minute changes in subnetwork integration are of importance for task performance.resolution [24]. The Power parcellation of the brain was used and the following ten subnetworks were studied (following the Cole et al, 2013 network template [25]): DMNdefault mode, SM -sensorimotor, VIS -visual, FP -fronto-parietal attention, SAsaliency, CO -cingulo-opercular, AU -auditory, Sub -subcortical, DA -dorsal attention and VA -ventral attention subnetwork [26].Our aim with the current study was two-fold.…”
mentioning
confidence: 70%
“…Perturbed functionality of RSNs contributes to a range of brain diseases including epilepsy [9], Alzheimer's disease [10], autism [11], depression [12] and schizophrenia [13]. Although alterations of RSNs have been subject to numerous studies, characterization of their complex dynamics remains an open question in the brain sciences [1,[14][15][16][17][18][19][20][21]. This is a significant challenge in modern neuroscience because temporal brain complexity may provide a quantitative view of brain function at the phenomenological level which in turn, may leads to the development of more efficient diagnostic and prognostic markers of brain diseases.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State-specific network frames could then be reallocated to specific times, depending on which "state" the system is visiting at different times, reconstructing thus an effective temporal network with the same time-resolution as the original recordings (see e.g. 30 for an analogous approach used at the macro-scale of fMRI signals). In this way it would become possible to link temporal network reconfiguration events to actual behavior, probing hence their direct functional relevance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%