From Street‐Level to System‐Level Bureaucracies: How Information and Communication Technology is Transforming Administrative Discretion and Constitutional Control

Abstract

The use of information and communication technology (ICT) is rapidly changing the structure of a number of large, executive public agencies. They used to be machine bureaucracies in which street‐level officials exercised ample administrative discretion in dealing with individual clients. In some realms, the street‐level bureaucrats have vanished. Instead of street‐level bureaucracies, they have become system‐level bureaucracies. System analysts and software designers are the key actors in these executive agencies. This article explores the implications of this transformation from the perspective of the constitutional state. Thanks to ICT, the implementation of the law has virtually been perfected. However, some new issues rise: What about the discretionary power of the system‐level bureaucrats? How can we guarantee due process and fairness in difficult cases? The article ends with several institutional innovations that may help to embed these system‐level bureaucracies in the constitutional state.

Europe at the frontline: analysing street-level motivations for the use of European Union migration law

“…Additionally, while there is a trend towards more e-service provision in many traditional street-level bureaucracies (Bovens and Zouridis 2002), the implementers in this study are typical street-level implementers. They have face-to-face contact with their clients and rely little on computer-assisted case assessment.…”

E-government and organizational change: Reappraising the role of ICT and bureaucracy in public service delivery

“…As a result, ICTs construct a new set of structured sequences and interdependences that regulate the way in which organizational procedures and processes are executed. Therefore, ICTs carry regulative properties that structure social and organizational orders, providing stable and standardized means of social interaction (Bovens and Zouridis 2002;Kallinikos 2005) shaped into the technical functionalities of the systems.…”

“…Moreover, the technological substrate for the execution of procedures and protocols are open to "become highly regulated through prescriptions, the specification of skill profiles and requirements and role formation" (Kallinikos 2006, 34), information technology equating to a regulative regime (Kallinikos 2009) that stabilizes and structures social interaction (Bovens and Zouridis 2002;Kallinikos 2005).…”

Discretion in the “Backyard of Law”: Case Handling of Debt Relief in Sweden

“…NPM and managerialism is often seen as leading to increasing formalization. With the accompanying development in ICT, the traditional street-level bureaucrat is said to be replaced by "screen-level www.professionsandprofessionalism.com Page 3 bureaucrats", who process cases through formats designed into computer software (Bovens and Zouridis, 2002). The development of "lean" processes and casemanagement systems also implies formalization and standardization.…”