“…What we wish to do is to explore what such granularity consists of; what kind of granularity it is, relative to ethnographic observations; and, most importantly, what novel kinds of granularities or data densities we might get when attempting to stitch together different digital-transactional and qualitative-ethnographic observations. This approach of ours shares its overall orientation, as noted, with like-minded attempts to work across the ethnography-big data divide (e.g., Curran, 2013;Ford, 2014;Taylor and Horst, 2013) -while also, we believe, adding notions of complementarity, stitching and granularity as novel methodological orientations for what that might entail in practice. Moreover, the particularities of our data test site mean that we inscribe this exploration into the wider research field of college parties (e.g., Ronen, 2010;Sweeney, 2014), understood here in the Goffmanian sense of a relatively dense, evanescent yet semi-coordinated social occasion of bodily co-presence (Goffman, 1963;Wynn, 2016).…”