From Tactical Urbanism Action to Institutionalised Urban Planning and Educational Tool: The Evolution of Park(ing) Day

Abstract

<jats:p>A singular and modest activist action, a temporary park created in San Francisco, grew into the global urban Park(ing) Day (PD) phenomenon. This tactical urbanism event not only expanded to be annually celebrated in thousands of parking lots all over the world but became an inspiration for urban planning and policy changes. The permanent rendition of Park(ing) Day, parklets, resulted from the movement but did not stop the spread of PD itself. This article presents case studies from New Zealand and Poland, two geographically and culturally distant locations where PD has further developed and evolved gaining local qualities. Through research methods such as research in design, secondary data analysis and expert interviews we study the trajectory of PD evolution and the role and interpretation of it in different parts of the globe. The results show a narrative of successive popularisation and institutionalisation as well as diversification. Departing from its grassroots, guerilla and assertive traits, PD has grown to become an artistic, creative and urban planning tool. As an established, recognised action and an ‘attractive’ idea, PD has great potential for designer education, allowing a venue for implementing methods such as design-build and live project.</jats:p>

Green Infrastructure in the Time of Social Distancing: Urban Policy and the Tactical Pandemic Urbanism

“…This shines a light on highly developed and perhaps "over-designed" green spaces with an excess of amenities and formal functions. Green spaces can be created and programmed with a more flexible approach, allowing spontaneous and bottom-up, tactical use [21]. Green spaces that are lighter in pre-designed function, created with a lowbudget mindset can be seen by both the experts and active users as equally successful and valuable to resource-heavy, expensive designs [86].…”

How Do Scholars Communicate the ‘Temporary Turn’ in Urban Studies? A Socio-Semiotic Framework

“…Most likely, this means that TU requires further study. There is place for this continued study in our journals, within our classrooms and even more so on our streets as recent challenges with the pandemic continue to heighten the immediate readiness for TU (Herman & Rodgers, 2020).…”

“…Considering the recent normalization of TU through pandemic-oriented policies and Covid-19 circumstances (Herman & Rodgers, 2020), citizens, practitioners and policy makers should also be made aware of the semantic challenges and socio-semiotic confusion involved with competing TU symbols. Certain social groups will prefer a particular TU signified over another.…”

Hostile prototypes: plastic urbanism in San Francisco

“…27 This orchestration of temporary urbanisms has provoked remarks that the unsanctioned styles of community action widely associated with such approaches lose their 'subversive potential' when appropriated by authorities. 28 Although formal and informal practices have always amalgamated in cities, 29 it is argued that officials are neutralising grassroots initiatives by taking their perceived affordability, creativity and flexibility as a leaner method of testing designs and preparing sites for eventual redevelopment through making them attractive to investors and raising land and property value. 30 Temporary urbanism has consequently been described as complicit, under the guise of participation, in neoliberalist configurations of power, said to increase precarity and erode public space through encouraging economic speculation, deregulation and the withdrawal of state support for essential services.…”