2022
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2210.17538
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the EFT of Spinning Gravitating Objects to Poincaré and Gauge Invariance

Abstract: In this paper we confirm the generalized actions of the complete NLO cubicin-spin interactions for generic compact objects which were tackled first via an extension of the EFT of spinning gravitating objects. The interaction potentials are made up of 6 independent sectors, including a new unique sector that is proportional to the square of the quadrupolar deformation parameter, C ES 2 . We derived the full Hamiltonians in an arbitrary reference frame and in generic kinematic configurations. Using these most ge… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In order to fully establish a correspondence between the spinning A n amplitudesor equivalent specifications of couplings in effective worldline theories in the PM [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and post-Newtonian (PN) [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] approaches -and classical spinning BHs, matching computations that go beyond the stationary limit need to be done. A first step has been taken along these lines by the authors of [60], where, up to the third order in the BH's spin, results for the 2PM aligned spin scattering angle -computed in [6] from the minimal coupling A 3 and A 4 -were shown to be consistent with the general-relativistic "self-force" calculations of the linear perturbations of a Kerr spacetime sourced by a small orbiting body [61,62]; in particular, the gravitational observables, Detweiler redshift [63], and the circular orbit precession frequency were considered for the matching computation in [60].…”
Section: Jhep05(2023)211mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to fully establish a correspondence between the spinning A n amplitudesor equivalent specifications of couplings in effective worldline theories in the PM [35][36][37][38][39][40][41] and post-Newtonian (PN) [42][43][44][45][46][47][48][49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59] approaches -and classical spinning BHs, matching computations that go beyond the stationary limit need to be done. A first step has been taken along these lines by the authors of [60], where, up to the third order in the BH's spin, results for the 2PM aligned spin scattering angle -computed in [6] from the minimal coupling A 3 and A 4 -were shown to be consistent with the general-relativistic "self-force" calculations of the linear perturbations of a Kerr spacetime sourced by a small orbiting body [61,62]; in particular, the gravitational observables, Detweiler redshift [63], and the circular orbit precession frequency were considered for the matching computation in [60].…”
Section: Jhep05(2023)211mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…in [12][13][14][15]. Recently, the construction was completed up to the overwhelming 5PN order in [16,17].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The observations of gravitational waves from compact binary coalescence [4,5] have necessitated a better understanding of compact binary dynamics, attracting practitioners of quantum field theory (QFT) to develop QFT-inspired methods for handling the relativistic two-body problem . An important aspect of relativistic two-body dynamics is the effects of spin, where QFT-inspired methods have proved to be powerful tools for their understanding, as can be inferred from the vast number of recent works on the subject; post-Newtonian effective field theory (PNEFT) [49][50][51][52][53][54][55][56][57][58][59], scattering amplitudes [1,2,[60][61][62][63][64][65][66][67][68][69][70][71][72], post-Minkowskian effective field theory [73], and worldline quantum field theory (WQFT) [74][75][76][77][78]. Of course, each approach comes with its own shortcomings; e.g.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%