2010
DOI: 10.2140/gt.2010.14.1383
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

From the hyperbolic 24–cell to the cuboctahedron

Abstract: Abstract. We describe a family of 4-dimensional hyperbolic orbifolds, constructed by deforming an infinite volume orbifold obtained from the ideal, hyperbolic 24-cell by removing two walls. This family provides an infinite number of infinitesimally rigid, infinite covolume, geometrically finite discrete subgroups of Isom(H 4 ). It also leads to finite covolume Coxeter groups which are the homomorphic image of the group of reflections in the hyperbolic 24-cell. The examples are constructed very explicitly, both… Show more

Help me understand this report
View preprint versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

1
78
0

Year Published

2016
2016
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 17 publications
(79 citation statements)
references
References 15 publications
1
78
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In the case of the negative facets, the pairing map is given by the involution i defined by (7). This induces an orientation-preserving involution of the figure-eight knot complement which is, however, not fixed-point-free.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the case of the negative facets, the pairing map is given by the involution i defined by (7). This induces an orientation-preserving involution of the figure-eight knot complement which is, however, not fixed-point-free.…”
Section: Proof Of Theorem 31mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Note that Conjecture 1.1 is false without the assumption that is convex cocompact. A counterexample was studied in [5]. As a first step toward proving this conjecture, our goal is to verify it in a specific 4-dimensional example.…”
Section: Definition 21mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Even weakening the convex cocompact condition to geometric finiteness makes the conjecture false. A counterexample is presented in [5]. Nonetheless, it seems reasonable to expect that Conjecture 1.1 is true.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 98%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The construction goes as follows. The fundamental ingredient is a deforming family F t ⊂ H 4 of infinite-volume polytopes built by Kerckhoff and Storm in [14]. We truncate here F t via two additional hyperplanes to get a deforming family of finite-volume polytopes P t ⊂ H 4 .…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%